All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:27:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090310142710.GF3157@hack> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090306194921.GA2881@cs.unibo.it>

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:49:22PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>It is currently impossible to run a user-mode linux machine inside another user-mode 
>linux (UML on UML). It breaks after a few instructions. When it tries to check
>whether SYSEMU is installed (the inner) UML receives an inconsistent result 
>(from the outer UML).
>
>This is the output of a broken attempt:
>$ ./linux mem=256m ubd0=cow
>Locating the bottom of the address space ... 0x0
>Locating the top of the address space ... 0xc0000000
>Core dump limits :
>        soft - 0
>        hard - NONE
>Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
>Checking ptrace new tags for syscall emulation...unsupported
>Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256
>$
>
>The problem is the following:
>PTRACE_SYSCALL/SINGLESTEP is currently managed inside arch_ptrace for ARCH=um.
>
>PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP is not captured in arch_ptrace's switch, therefore
>it is erroneously passed back to ptrace_request (in kernel/ptrace).
>
>This simple patch simply forces ptrace to return an error on PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP
>as it is unsupported on ARCH=um, and fixes the problem.
>
>I posted the same patch one month ago. I just tested it again against the latest kernel.
>
>	renzo
>
>Signed-off-by: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew, would you like to put this patch into -mm? It looks fine for me.

Renzo, I remember you sent some patches about PTRACE_SYSEMU support
for UML some days ago, could you please rebase them against the latest
-git tree and resend?

Thank you very much! Have a nice day!


Yours,
Cong
 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-06 19:49 [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start Renzo Davoli
2009-03-08  6:49 ` Américo Wang
2009-03-10 14:27 ` Américo Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090310142710.GF3157@hack \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.