All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@novell.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [aarcange@redhat.com: [PATCH] fork vs gup(-fast) fix]
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:55:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311205529.GR27823@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903111328180.32478@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:33:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Btw, if we don't do that, then there are better alternatives. One is:
> 
>  - fork already always takes the write lock on mmap_sem (and f*ck no, I 
>    doubt anybody will ever care one whit how "parallel" you can do forks 
>    from threads, so I don't think this is an issue)
> 
>  - Just make the rule be that people who use get_user_pages() always 
>    have to have the read-lock on mmap_sem until they've used the pages.

How do you handle pages where gup already returned and I/O still in
flight? Forcing gup-fast to be called with mmap_sem already hold (like
gup used to require) only avoids the need of changes in gup-fast
AFAICT. You'll still get pages that are pinned and calling gup-fast
under mmap_sem (no matter if read or even write mode) won't make a
difference, still those pages will be pinned while fork runs and with
dma going to them (by O_DIRECT or some driver using gup, as long as
PageReserved isn't set on them).

> We already take the read-lock for the lookup (well, not for the gup, but 
> for all the slow cases), but I'm saying that we could go one step further 
> - just read-lock over the _whole_ O_DIRECT read or write. That way you 
> literally protect against concurrent fork()s.

Releasing the mmap_sem read mode in the irq-completion handler context
should be possible, however fork will end up throttled blocking for
I/O which isn't very nice behavior. BTW, direct-io.c is a total mess,
I couldn't even figure out where to release those locks in the I/O
completion handlers when I tried something like this with PG_lock
instead of the mmap_sem...  Eventually I gave it up because this isn't
just about O_DIRECT but all gup users have this trouble with fork.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-11 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090311170611.GA2079@elte.hu>
2009-03-11 17:33 ` [aarcange@redhat.com: [PATCH] fork vs gup(-fast) fix] Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 17:41   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 17:58     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 18:37       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 18:46         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:01           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:59             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 20:19               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 20:33                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 20:55                   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2009-03-11 21:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 21:57                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 22:06                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 22:07                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 22:22                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-11 22:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-14  5:07                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-11 20:48                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-14  5:06                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-14  5:20                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 16:01                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-16 16:23                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 16:32                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 16:50                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 17:02                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 17:19                               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 17:42                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:02                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:05                                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:17                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:33                                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 19:22                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  5:44                                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:14                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:29                                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 19:17                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  5:42                                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17  5:58                                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:37                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 18:28                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 23:59                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18  2:04                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-22 12:23                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  0:13                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 16:29                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-23 16:46                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-24  5:08                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-24 13:43                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 17:56                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-30 10:52                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
     [not found]                                 ` <200904022307.12043.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
2009-04-03  3:49                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17  0:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  0:56                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 12:19                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 16:43                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 17:01                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 17:10                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 17:43                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:19                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:46                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 19:03                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 19:35                                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 19:55                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:06           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12  5:36           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 16:23             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 17:00               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 17:20                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 17:23                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 18:06                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 18:58                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-13 16:09                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 19:34                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-14  4:59                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 13:56                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 16:01                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14  4:46                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14  5:06                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-11 18:53     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 18:22   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 19:06     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 19:15       ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090311205529.GR27823@random.random \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@novell.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.