From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [RFC] IO Controller Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:57:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20090312145730.GG10919@redhat.com> References: <1236823015-4183-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> <49B8810B.7030603@oss.ntt.co.jp> <49B8B1FB.1040506@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: anqin Cc: paolo.valente-rcYM44yAMweonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org, dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, oz-kernel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jmoyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, arozansk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, fernando-w0OK63jvRlAuJ+9fw/WgBHgSJqDPrsil@public.gmane.org, balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:11:07PM +0800, anqin wrote: > > Why? When this is ready to be merged, then it should be based on Jens' block-tree, > > or akpm's mm tree. And this version currently is based on 2.6.29-rc4, so if you > > want to try it out, just prepare a 2.6.29-rc4 kernel tree. > > > > I have checked the LKML and see these patches (on web pages) are based on > 2.6.27. It seemed too old. > > You mean that the codes have new patch files in 2.6.29-rc4? I guess my mistake that I did not specify the kernel version in my mail. These patches should apply on top of 2.6.29-rc7. Thanks Vivek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755110AbZCLPAG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:00:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753575AbZCLO7v (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:59:51 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50384 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756449AbZCLO7u (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:59:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:57:30 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: anqin Cc: Li Zefan , Takuya Yoshikawa , oz-kernel@redhat.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, menage@google.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, arozansk@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, fernando@intellilink.co.jp, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC] IO Controller Message-ID: <20090312145730.GG10919@redhat.com> References: <1236823015-4183-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> <49B8810B.7030603@oss.ntt.co.jp> <49B8B1FB.1040506@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:11:07PM +0800, anqin wrote: > > Why? When this is ready to be merged, then it should be based on Jens' block-tree, > > or akpm's mm tree. And this version currently is based on 2.6.29-rc4, so if you > > want to try it out, just prepare a 2.6.29-rc4 kernel tree. > > > > I have checked the LKML and see these patches (on web pages) are based on > 2.6.27. It seemed too old. > > You mean that the codes have new patch files in 2.6.29-rc4? I guess my mistake that I did not specify the kernel version in my mail. These patches should apply on top of 2.6.29-rc7. Thanks Vivek