All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: improve seed in randconfig
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:09:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090315130930.GA7146@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f740e80903150353i233d0da5rabde6e97607e3435@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:53:03AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:28, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> > 'make randconfig' uses glibc's rand function, and the seed of
> > that PRNG is set via:
> >
> >                        srand(time(NULL));
> >
> > But 'time()' only increases once every second - freezing the
> > randconfig result within a single second.
> >
> > My Nehalem testbox does randconfig much faster than 1 second
> >  and i have a few scripts that do 'randconfig until condition X'
> > loops.
> >
> > Those scripts currently waste a lot of CPU time due to randconfig
> > changing its seed only once per second currently.
> >
> > Change the seed to be micrseconds based. (I checked the statistical
> > spread of the seed - the now.tv_sec*now.tv_usec multiplication
> > there further improves it.)
> 
> > +                       gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> > +
> > +                       seed = (unsigned int)(now.tv_sec*now.tv_usec);
> 
> Just wondering: may there be some platforms that don't offer microsecond
> resolution, and tv_usec is always zero?
That would indeed be bad for the seed.
Googling did not turn up anything.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-15 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-15 10:23 kconfig - fix randconfig Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-15 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: fix randconfig for choice blocks Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-15 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: improve seed in randconfig Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-15 10:53   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-15 13:09     ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2009-03-15 18:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 21:47         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2009-03-15 22:03           ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090315130930.GA7146@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.