From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Nathaniel W. Turner" <nate@houseofnate.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: open filesystem device exclusively
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:23:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090316212332.GA8496@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B491EA.4090003@houseofnate.net>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:50:02PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> (Error messages could probably be improved to be more user-friendly in
> this new failure case, and it probably wouldn't hurt to add a BLKROGET
> ioctl to check for read-only block devices with read-write permissions,
> but this does the job for me.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathaniel W. Turner <nate@houseofnate.net>
> ---
> repair/init.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/repair/init.c b/repair/init.c
> index 8e508c4..7e5052c 100644
> --- a/repair/init.c
> +++ b/repair/init.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ xfs_init(libxfs_init_t *args)
> args->isreadonly = (LIBXFS_ISREADONLY | LIBXFS_ISINACTIVE);
> else if (dangerously)
> args->isreadonly = (LIBXFS_ISINACTIVE | LIBXFS_DANGEROUSLY);
> + else
> + args->isreadonly = LIBXFS_EXCLUSIVELY;
Given that we skip it for -d and -n this is fine with me.
I think we might want to delay this change in the way xfs_repair
operates until after we get a 3.0.1 release out with all the build
system fixes (hopefully really soon)
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 3:22 [PATCH] xfs_repair: open filesystem device exclusively Nathaniel W. Turner
2009-03-09 3:50 ` Nathaniel W. Turner
2009-03-16 21:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-05-07 2:46 ` Nathaniel W. Turner
2009-05-10 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-07 2:55 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090316212332.GA8496@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=nate@houseofnate.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.