From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegegr <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:27:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090317192735.GC4287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237281143-8768-2-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:12:19AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegegr wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>
> This patch adds support for multi-chip NAND devices to the FSL-UPM
> driver. This requires support for multiple GPIOs for the RNB pins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> index 7815a40..ca7e85a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <asm/fsl_lbc.h>
>
> +#define FSL_UPM_NAND_MAX_CHIPS 4
Is there any reason to hardcode max chips? Some obscure limit in the
UPMs maybe?
Otherwise we'd better allocate the rnb_gpios dynamically, depending
on the num-chips property.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 9:12 [PATCH 0/4] NAND: Multi-chip support for FSL-UPM for TQM8548 modules Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add support for selecting chips via MAR Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: Add wait flags to support board/chip specific delays Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/85xx: TQM8548: Update DTS file for multi-chip support Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 19:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 7:34 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-18 18:51 ` Scott Wood
2009-03-17 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: Add wait flags to support board/chip specific delays Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-17 19:27 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-03-18 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-18 13:02 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-17 13:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] NAND: Multi-chip support for FSL-UPM for TQM8548 modules Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090317192735.GC4287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.