From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: new Linux loader (Re: [PATCH] linux/gfxterm integration)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:25:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090318102539.GE20072@thorin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090313194447.GA17416@thorin>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 08:44:47PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> This new patch avoids the problem by accessing struct grub_video_render_target
> from its current location.
>
> When we have more than one video backend, and a clear idea on which parts are
> generic and which are backend-specific, we could readjust. For now this makes
> VBE happy.
>
> Thoughts?
Ok, committed.
Btw, I'm happy to announce that the new Linux loader is fully usable on i386-pc
now, with no significant regressions.
I'd like to find a way to make it available to end users. How would you think
of a rename?
- loader/i386/pc/linux.c becomes the "legacy_linux" command or so.
- loader/i386/linux.c becomes "linux" command.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-06 19:57 [PATCH] linux/gfxterm integration Robert Millan
2009-03-08 13:01 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-08 13:09 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-08 13:35 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2009-03-13 19:44 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-13 20:10 ` David Miller
2009-03-18 10:25 ` Robert Millan [this message]
2009-03-18 13:09 ` new Linux loader (Re: [PATCH] linux/gfxterm integration) phcoder
2009-03-21 17:50 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-22 16:00 ` [PATCH] build 32-bit Linux loader as `linux', rename legacy loader to `linux16' Robert Millan
2009-03-28 12:53 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-30 13:32 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-03-30 14:35 ` phcoder
2009-03-30 16:06 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2009-03-30 21:51 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-04-01 13:23 ` Robert Millan
2009-04-01 14:04 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-04-01 14:22 ` Robert Millan
2009-04-01 13:33 ` Robert Millan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090318102539.GE20072@thorin \
--to=rmh@aybabtu.com \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.