From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:46:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20090319134649.GX11935@one.firstfloor.org> References: <49C12E64.1000301@us.ibm.com> <87prge1rhu.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <1237467559.6926.31.camel@hermosa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , Vernon Mauery , netdev , LKML , rt-users To: "Peter W. Morreale" Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:54273 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754460AbZCSNqQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:46:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1237467559.6926.31.camel@hermosa> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline. For mutexes, but not for spinlocks. And qdisc uses spinlocks. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.