From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: DaVinci: ASoC: Adds McASP clock support for TI DM646X processor Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:28:37 -0700 Message-ID: <200903191428.38014.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20090319190942.GA8966@sirena.org.uk> <87prgdnrkx.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.187]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id BBD6224367 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:28:40 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87prgdnrkx.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Mark Brown , "Medisetty, Naresh" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thursday 19 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Sure, but what I don't want in that DAI driver is conditional code > because of different clock names on different chips. =A0For example, > some devices may only have one clk, so the hardware name is actualy > "mcasp" instead of "mcasp0" etc. Agreed that the clock setup should be in the arch/arm/mach-davinci part of the tree ... but, for the record, I wouldn't find it at all strange to see all such clocks named "mcasp0" instead of having some boards use "mcasp" if there's only one. :)