All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090319165713.27274.94129.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

Impact: Refactor mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim()

From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch refactors the arguments passed to
mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() into flags, so that new parameters don't
have to be passed as we make the reclaim routine more flexible


Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f5b61b8..992aac8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -227,6 +227,14 @@ pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = {
 #define MEMFILE_TYPE(val)	(((val) >> 16) & 0xffff)
 #define MEMFILE_ATTR(val)	((val) & 0xffff)
 
+/*
+ * Reclaim flags for mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim
+ */
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT	0x0
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP	(1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT)
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT	0x1
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK	(1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT)
+
 static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
 static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
 static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
@@ -889,11 +897,14 @@ mem_cgroup_select_victim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
  * If shrink==true, for avoiding to free too much, this returns immedieately.
  */
 static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
-				   gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap, bool shrink)
+						gfp_t gfp_mask,
+						unsigned long reclaim_options)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *victim;
 	int ret, total = 0;
 	int loop = 0;
+	bool noswap = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
+	bool shrink = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK;
 
 	while (loop < 2) {
 		victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
@@ -1029,7 +1040,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	while (1) {
 		int ret;
-		bool noswap = false;
+		unsigned long flags = 0;
 
 		ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res,
 						&soft_fail_res);
@@ -1042,7 +1053,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				break;
 			/* mem+swap counter fails */
 			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
-			noswap = true;
+			flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
 			mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
 									memsw);
 		} else
@@ -1054,7 +1065,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			goto nomem;
 
 		ret = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
-							noswap, false);
+							flags);
 		if (ret)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1766,7 +1777,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct page *page,
 
 	do {
 		progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem,
-					gfp_mask, true, false);
+					gfp_mask, MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP);
 		progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
 	} while (!progress && --retry);
 
@@ -1821,7 +1832,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			break;
 
 		progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
-						   false, true);
+						   MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
 		curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
 		/* Usage is reduced ? */
   		if (curusage >= oldusage)
@@ -1869,7 +1880,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		if (!ret)
 			break;
 
-		mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true, true);
+		mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
+						MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP |
+						MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
 		curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
 		/* Usage is reduced ? */
 		if (curusage >= oldusage)

-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-19 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] Memory controller soft limit documentation (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] Memory controller soft limit interface (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] Memory controller soft limit organize cgroups (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20  3:46   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-22 23:53       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  3:34         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  3:38           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  4:15             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  4:23               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  8:22                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:47                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  9:30                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  4:59   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  5:29     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  5:39       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  5:53         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  6:01           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  6:21             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  6:38               ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  5:07   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  5:18     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  5:22       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 16:57 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-03-20  3:47   ` [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] Memory controller soft limit reclaim on contention (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20  4:06   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:27     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  0:02       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  4:12         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  4:20           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  8:28             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:30               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  3:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  5:22   ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  5:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  6:12     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  6:17       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  6:35         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  8:24           ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  9:12             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  9:23               ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:35         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:52           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  9:46             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  9:41       ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 17:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-24 23:55   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  3:42     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  4:02       ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  4:05         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.