From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] ftrace: protect running nmi (V3)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:01:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319200200.152583560@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090319200122.512803803@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-ftrace-protect-running-nmi-V3.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4843 bytes --]
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
When I review the sensitive code ftrace_nmi_enter(), I found
the atomic variable nmi_running does protect NMI VS do_ftrace_mod_code(),
but it can not protects NMI(entered nmi) VS NMI(ftrace_nmi_enter()).
cpu#1 | cpu#2 | cpu#3
ftrace_nmi_enter() | do_ftrace_mod_code() |
not modify | |
------------------------|-----------------------|--
executing | set mod_code_write = 1|
executing --|-----------------------|--------------------
executing | | ftrace_nmi_enter()
executing | | do modify
------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------
ftrace_nmi_exit() | |
cpu#3 may be being modified the code which is still being executed on cpu#1,
it will have undefined results and possibly take a GPF, this patch
prevents it occurred.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
LKML-Reference: <49C0B411.30003@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index 1d0d7f4..57b33ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ static unsigned char *ftrace_call_replace(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
*
* 1) Put the instruction pointer into the IP buffer
* and the new code into the "code" buffer.
- * 2) Set a flag that says we are modifying code
- * 3) Wait for any running NMIs to finish.
- * 4) Write the code
- * 5) clear the flag.
- * 6) Wait for any running NMIs to finish.
+ * 2) Wait for any running NMIs to finish and set a flag that says
+ * we are modifying code, it is done in an atomic operation.
+ * 3) Write the code
+ * 4) clear the flag.
+ * 5) Wait for any running NMIs to finish.
*
* If an NMI is executed, the first thing it does is to call
* "ftrace_nmi_enter". This will check if the flag is set to write
@@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ static unsigned char *ftrace_call_replace(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
* are the same as what exists.
*/
+#define MOD_CODE_WRITE_FLAG (1 << 31) /* set when NMI should do the write */
static atomic_t nmi_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static int mod_code_status; /* holds return value of text write */
-static int mod_code_write; /* set when NMI should do the write */
static void *mod_code_ip; /* holds the IP to write to */
static void *mod_code_newcode; /* holds the text to write to the IP */
@@ -114,6 +114,20 @@ int ftrace_arch_read_dyn_info(char *buf, int size)
return r;
}
+static void clear_mod_flag(void)
+{
+ int old = atomic_read(&nmi_running);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ int new = old & ~MOD_CODE_WRITE_FLAG;
+
+ if (old == new)
+ break;
+
+ old = atomic_cmpxchg(&nmi_running, old, new);
+ }
+}
+
static void ftrace_mod_code(void)
{
/*
@@ -127,27 +141,39 @@ static void ftrace_mod_code(void)
/* if we fail, then kill any new writers */
if (mod_code_status)
- mod_code_write = 0;
+ clear_mod_flag();
}
void ftrace_nmi_enter(void)
{
- atomic_inc(&nmi_running);
- /* Must have nmi_running seen before reading write flag */
- smp_mb();
- if (mod_code_write) {
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&nmi_running) & MOD_CODE_WRITE_FLAG) {
+ smp_rmb();
ftrace_mod_code();
atomic_inc(&nmi_update_count);
}
+ /* Must have previous changes seen before executions */
+ smp_mb();
}
void ftrace_nmi_exit(void)
{
/* Finish all executions before clearing nmi_running */
- smp_wmb();
+ smp_mb();
atomic_dec(&nmi_running);
}
+static void wait_for_nmi_and_set_mod_flag(void)
+{
+ if (!atomic_cmpxchg(&nmi_running, 0, MOD_CODE_WRITE_FLAG))
+ return;
+
+ do {
+ cpu_relax();
+ } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&nmi_running, 0, MOD_CODE_WRITE_FLAG));
+
+ nmi_wait_count++;
+}
+
static void wait_for_nmi(void)
{
if (!atomic_read(&nmi_running))
@@ -167,14 +193,9 @@ do_ftrace_mod_code(unsigned long ip, void *new_code)
mod_code_newcode = new_code;
/* The buffers need to be visible before we let NMIs write them */
- smp_wmb();
-
- mod_code_write = 1;
-
- /* Make sure write bit is visible before we wait on NMIs */
smp_mb();
- wait_for_nmi();
+ wait_for_nmi_and_set_mod_flag();
/* Make sure all running NMIs have finished before we write the code */
smp_mb();
@@ -182,13 +203,9 @@ do_ftrace_mod_code(unsigned long ip, void *new_code)
ftrace_mod_code();
/* Make sure the write happens before clearing the bit */
- smp_wmb();
-
- mod_code_write = 0;
-
- /* make sure NMIs see the cleared bit */
smp_mb();
+ clear_mod_flag();
wait_for_nmi();
return mod_code_status;
--
1.6.2
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 20:01 [PATCH 0/7] [GIT PULL] tip/tracing/ftrace Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] tracing: give easy way to clear trace buffer Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-03-19 23:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:01 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-03-19 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] function-graph: consolidate prologues for output Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] tracing: make print_(b)printk_msg_only global Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] function-graph: calculate function depth within function graph tracer Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] tracing: remove recording function depth from trace_printk Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] function-graph: show binary events as comments Steven Rostedt
2009-03-19 20:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-03-20 9:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] [GIT PULL] tip/tracing/ftrace Ingo Molnar
2009-03-20 10:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-20 13:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-03-20 16:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090319200200.152583560@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.