From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: jd <jdsw2002@yahoo.com>
Cc: KVM List <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kvm binary names
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:17:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320181715.GK2167@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <327276.24405.qm@web35804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:57:50AM -0700, jd wrote:
>
> Hi
> What is the motivation for having different kvm binary names on various linux distributions.. ?
>
> -- kvm
> -- qemu-system-x86_84
> -- qemu-kvm
I can tell you the history from the Fedora POV at least...
We already had 'qemu', 'qemu-system-x86_64', etc from the existing
plain qemu emulator RPMs we distributed.
The KVM makefile creates a binary call qemu-system-x86_64 but this
clashes with the existing QEMU RPM, so we had to rename it somehow
to allow parallel installation of KVM and QEMU RPMs.
KVM already ships with a python script called 'kvm' and we didn't
want to clash with that either, so we eventually settled on calling
it 'qemu-kvm'. Other distros didn't worry about clash with the python
script so called their binary just 'kvm'
Ultimately this mess will resolve itself as all of KVM gets merged into
upstream QEMU and we no longer have a separate code fork. So the regular
QEMU RPM's qemu-system-x86_64 emulator binary will have KVM support
builtin by default
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-20 17:57 kvm binary names jd
2009-03-20 18:17 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2009-03-30 21:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-03-30 21:26 ` Glauber Costa
2009-03-31 9:40 ` Daniel P. Berrange
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-22 14:46 jd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090320181715.GK2167@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jdsw2002@yahoo.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.