From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756274AbZCVUm1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:42:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754592AbZCVUmS (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:42:18 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:35654 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753659AbZCVUmR (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:42:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:41:56 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] updates for tip/tracing/ftrace Message-ID: <20090322204156.GA27113@elte.hu> References: <20090320183849.GA3657@elte.hu> <20090320191926.GJ6698@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090320192721.GI6224@elte.hu> <20090320194617.GA5934@nowhere> <20090320195414.GA24129@elte.hu> <20090320204848.GA6044@nowhere> <20090321100129.GC7201@elte.hu> <20090321165804.GA21366@elte.hu> <20090322194153.GA10112@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090322194153.GA10112@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > found another, unrelated lockup with the event tracer: > > europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> cat enable > 0 > europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> echo 1 > enable > europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> sync > europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> cat > ../../../trace_pipe > <...>-2870 [000] 688.730160: sched_wakeup_new: task > bash:2898 [120] success=1 > <...>-2870 [001] 689.945375: sched_wakeup_new: task > bash:2899 [120] success=1 > > [hard lockup] ok, tracked it down - it's the new trace_wake_up() from within wake_up_new_task() => bad idea. I think this was introduced via: 6eaaa5d: tracing/core: use appropriate waiting on trace_pipe Ingo