From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
"devicetree-discuss list" <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>
Subject: physmap_of and partitions (mtd concat support)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:51:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903231151.10373.sr@denx.de> (raw)
I just noticed that physmap_of can't handle multiple devices of different type
described in one device node. For example the Intel P30 48F4400 (64MByte)
consists internally of 2 non-identical NOR chips. So a "simple"
flash@0,0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "cfi-flash";
reg = <0 0 0x04000000>;
bank-width = <2>;
device-width = <2>;
partition@0 {
label = "test-part";
reg = <0 0x04000000>;
};
}
is not working. It will "detect" 2 identical 32MByte chips which is wrong.
Adding a 2nd flash node solves this problem:
flash@0,0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "cfi-flash";
reg = <0 0 0x02000000>;
bank-width = <2>;
device-width = <2>;
partition@0 {
label = "test-part1";
reg = <0 0x02000000>;
};
}
flash@1,0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "cfi-flash";
reg = <0 0x02000000 0x02000000>;
bank-width = <2>;
device-width = <2>;
partition@0 {
label = "test-part2";
reg = <0 0x02000000>;
};
}
This way both chips are detected correctly.
Now the real problem: How should I describe a partition in the device tree
spanning over both devices (concat)?. The current physmap_of driver doesn't
handle concat at all (physmap.c does). I already have some ideas on how to
implement this concat support in physmap_of. But ideas about a device-tree
syntax for such partitions are very welcome.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-23 10:51 Stefan Roese [this message]
2009-03-23 15:37 ` physmap_of and partitions (mtd concat support) Grant Likely
2009-03-24 9:07 ` Stefan Roese
2009-03-24 14:57 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-24 14:57 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-24 15:39 ` Stefan Roese
2009-03-24 15:39 ` Stefan Roese
2009-03-24 16:28 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-24 16:28 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 9:35 ` Stefan Roese
2009-03-25 9:35 ` Stefan Roese
2009-03-25 13:28 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 13:28 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 14:14 ` Stefan Roese
2009-03-25 14:14 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903231151.10373.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.