From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Shorter series for 2.6.30 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:49:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20090324224906.GT19389@fieldses.org> References: <20090319004024.32404.68289.stgit@ingres.1015granger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([141.211.133.115]:39323 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755284AbZCXWtK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:49:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090319004024.32404.68289.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > Hi Trond, Bruce- > > Since Trond has sent some late-breaking patches for 2.6.29, I had to > fix some merge problems with my latest patch set. Jeff also found a > minor bug with rpcbind version 4 replies that I'd like to include. > > I've stripped this patch set down so it is just 23 patches. > Unfortunately, it touches server-side RPC stuff and client-side NFSv4 > callback and lockd support. I don't see a clean way to split these up. > > Can we discuss how to get these into 2.6.30? Perhaps, since these have > the greatest impact on client behavior, Trond should take all of these? Except as noted (#2), I'm fine with them. Happy to apply them to my tree, or if Trond takes them, he can add an Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields as desired to spread the blame around. --b.