Re: [RFC] ath9k's regulatory domain code changes (for ar9170)

[Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>]

On Tuesday 24 March 2009 21:58:47 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 March 2009 21:10:21 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > > > ath5k/9k specific
> > > > bits can eventually go in ath/{5k,9k} subdirs... not sure where 9170
> > > > lives then :)
> > >
> > > Wherever Christian wants it. If he finds re-usable bits then great.
> > maybe ath/9kusb ?
> 
> In that case maybe 9170/, we do have future USB plans.
alright, ath/9170/ it is!

> > > > I probably can't get to it until the weekend, but if you have more time,
> > > > Christian, feel free to adopt whatever you want from mine.  Otherwise I'll
> > > > pick up where Luis left off on the weekend.
> > Done! Patch attached, please add to the tree ;)
> 
> Nice....... so it seems all we need now is ath5k figured out and properly
> tested.
uhh, looks like ath5k/regd.c got dropped by accident?!

Regards,
	Chr