From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jody Belka Subject: Re: fs-backend on -unstable Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:02:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20090326000237.GP13428@pimb.org> References: <20090325171822.GY5737@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20090325175037.GI13428@pimb.org> <20090325180655.GA8031@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090325181412.GJ13428@pimb.org> <20090325182013.GA13718@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090325182501.GK13428@pimb.org> <20090325191730.GM13428@pimb.org> <20090325213833.GC13718@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090325224157.GO13428@pimb.org> <49CAB50A.8040205@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CAB50A.8040205@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Samuel Thibault , Xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:49:46PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Jody Belka wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > =20 > >>Jody Belka, le Wed 25 Mar 2009 19:17:30 +0000, a =E9crit : > >> =20 > >>>Apologies; it seems that there's some bug somewhere that means fs-ba= ckend > >>>doesn't work with a pvops-dom0. > >>> =20 > >>It'd be good to report that on xen-unstable. > >> =20 > > > >So, as mentioned above, fs-backend isn't working on a pvops-dom0. With > >non-pvops, running fs-backend looks like this: > > > >Connection to the xenbus deamon opened successfully. > >XS transaction is 3 > >xenbus_printf (backend/vfs/exports/0/name) <=3D default. > >Path changed backend/vfs/exports/requests > >Awaiting next connection. > > > > > >However, under pvops, this is all I get: > > = = =20 > >Connection to the xenbus deamon opened successfully. > >XS transaction is 3 > >xenbus_printf (backend/vfs/exports/0/name) <=3D default. > > > > > >And stubdom's can't make a connection to it. >=20 > Hm, I had it working not too long ago. But there are still some issues= =20 > starting hvm domains, and maybe stubdoms are also affected. >=20 > Does pv-grub work? Ok, had to sort out creating a linux domain, as had nothing I could actua= lly try pv-grub with on the test-box in question :) Anyway, having done so, pv-grub is working fine under pvops0 J