All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, amluto@gmail.com, kyle@redhat.com,
	mgross@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support for DMAR
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:58:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090326095844.GC19826@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238024827.2085.60.camel@macbook.infradead.org>


* David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 21:12 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > +static int iommu_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> > > +     struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> > > +     unsigned long flag;
> > > +     int i = 0;
> > > +
> > > +     if (init_iommu_hw())
> > > +             panic("IOMMU setup failed, DMAR can not start!\n");
> > 
> > Please dont panic boxes ... insert a WARN() and return.
> 
> Well, the box is going to die anyway. If it was using the IOMMU 
> before suspend, and you fail to re-initialise the IOMMU after 
> resume, then you're buggered.

except if one is testing suspend/resume (via pm-test) without 
actually suspending the hardware.

> But if you panic() immediately during the resume, the message is 
> unlikely to make it out even to a serial console. If you print a 
> warning and limp on, I suppose there's at least a _chance_ that it 
> might get seen.

yeah.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-26  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-25 18:45 [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support fenghua.yu
2009-03-25 18:45 ` [patch 1/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support for DMAR fenghua.yu
2009-03-25 20:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 23:47     ` David Woodhouse
2009-03-26  9:58       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-25 18:45 ` [patch 2/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support for Queued Invalidation fenghua.yu
2009-03-25 20:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 20:53 ` [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support Andrew Lutomirski
2009-03-25 20:57   ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-03-25 21:21     ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-24 19:58 2.6.29: can't resume from suspend with DMAR (intel iommu) enabled Andrew Lutomirski
2009-03-24 20:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-24 22:36   ` [PATCH 1/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support for DMAR Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090326095844.GC19826@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=amluto@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kyle@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.