From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Split kvm source tarballs Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:48:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20090326224805.GA17658@infradead.org> References: <49C64963.20601@redhat.com> <49CA2F16.1070905@codemonkey.ws> <49CA3058.3040600@redhat.com> <49CA355A.6010803@codemonkey.ws> <20090325164707.GA16225@infradead.org> <49CA71C8.3000407@redhat.com> <20090325181716.GA3215@infradead.org> <49CB4633.5020208@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Anthony Liguori , KVM list To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:41138 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752327AbZCZWsI (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:48:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CB4633.5020208@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:09:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > If the repo contains only the kit (external-module.h and the hack > scripts) we'll be left with dual repositories with their confusion and > unbisectability. If the repo contains both the kit and the code, I'll > need to commit every kvm.git change into that repository, which I'm sure > to botch now and then. > > Do you see any specific problem with dropping kvm-userspace.git/kernel/* > under kvm.git/scripts/kvm/? Adding more stuff to a kernel tree that doesn't apply to building that tree seems rather odd. But if it makes your life easier go for it, it's defintively much better than the current setup.