From: Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
To: lguest-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Cc: virtualization-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org,
Matias Zabaljauregui
<zabaljaureguiatgmail.com-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] lguest: use KVM hypercalls
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:22:37 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903271022.38244.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
From: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Impact: cleanup
This patch allow us to use KVM hypercalls
Signed-off-by: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h | 24 +---------
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/lguest/i386_head.S | 4 -
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 7 +-
drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c | 4 -
drivers/lguest/x86/core.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h
@@ -27,36 +27,20 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_para.h>
/*G:031 But first, how does our Guest contact the Host to ask for privileged
* operations? There are two ways: the direct way is to make a "hypercall",
* to make requests of the Host Itself.
*
- * Our hypercall mechanism uses the highest unused trap code (traps 32 and
- * above are used by real hardware interrupts). Fifteen hypercalls are
+ * We use the KVM hypercall mechanism. Eighteen hypercalls are
* available: the hypercall number is put in the %eax register, and the
- * arguments (when required) are placed in %edx, %ebx and %ecx. If a return
+ * arguments (when required) are placed in %ebx, %ecx and %edx. If a return
* value makes sense, it's returned in %eax.
*
* Grossly invalid calls result in Sudden Death at the hands of the vengeful
* Host, rather than returning failure. This reflects Winston Churchill's
* definition of a gentleman: "someone who is only rude intentionally". */
-static inline unsigned long
-hcall(unsigned long call,
- unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3)
-{
- /* "int" is the Intel instruction to trigger a trap. */
- asm volatile("int $" __stringify(LGUEST_TRAP_ENTRY)
- /* The call in %eax (aka "a") might be overwritten */
- : "=a"(call)
- /* The arguments are in %eax, %edx, %ebx & %ecx */
- : "a"(call), "d"(arg1), "b"(arg2), "c"(arg3)
- /* "memory" means this might write somewhere in memory.
- * This isn't true for all calls, but it's safe to tell
- * gcc that it might happen so it doesn't get clever. */
- : "memory");
- return call;
-}
/*:*/
/* Can't use our min() macro here: needs to be a constant */
@@ -65,7 +49,7 @@ hcall(unsigned long call,
#define LHCALL_RING_SIZE 64
struct hcall_args {
/* These map directly onto eax, ebx, ecx, edx in struct lguest_regs */
- unsigned long arg0, arg2, arg3, arg1;
+ unsigned long arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3;
};
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
--- a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void async_hcall(unsigned long ca
local_irq_save(flags);
if (lguest_data.hcall_status[next_call] != 0xFF) {
/* Table full, so do normal hcall which will flush table. */
- hcall(call, arg1, arg2, arg3);
+ kvm_hypercall3(call, arg1, arg2, arg3);
} else {
lguest_data.hcalls[next_call].arg0 = call;
lguest_data.hcalls[next_call].arg1 = arg1;
@@ -134,13 +134,32 @@ static void async_hcall(unsigned long ca
*
* So, when we're in lazy mode, we call async_hcall() to store the call for
* future processing: */
-static void lazy_hcall(unsigned long call,
+static void lazy_hcall1(unsigned long call,
+ unsigned long arg1)
+{
+ if (paravirt_get_lazy_mode() == PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE)
+ kvm_hypercall1(call, arg1);
+ else
+ async_hcall(call, arg1, 0, 0);
+}
+
+static void lazy_hcall2(unsigned long call,
+ unsigned long arg1,
+ unsigned long arg2)
+{
+ if (paravirt_get_lazy_mode() == PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE)
+ kvm_hypercall2(call, arg1, arg2);
+ else
+ async_hcall(call, arg1, arg2, 0);
+}
+
+static void lazy_hcall3(unsigned long call,
unsigned long arg1,
unsigned long arg2,
unsigned long arg3)
{
if (paravirt_get_lazy_mode() == PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE)
- hcall(call, arg1, arg2, arg3);
+ kvm_hypercall3(call, arg1, arg2, arg3);
else
async_hcall(call, arg1, arg2, arg3);
}
@@ -150,7 +169,7 @@ static void lguest_leave_lazy_mode(void)
static void lguest_leave_lazy_mode(void)
{
paravirt_leave_lazy(paravirt_get_lazy_mode());
- hcall(LHCALL_FLUSH_ASYNC, 0, 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall0(LHCALL_FLUSH_ASYNC);
}
/*G:033
@@ -224,7 +243,7 @@ static void lguest_write_idt_entry(gate_
/* Keep the local copy up to date. */
native_write_idt_entry(dt, entrynum, g);
/* Tell Host about this new entry. */
- hcall(LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY, entrynum, desc[0], desc[1]);
+ kvm_hypercall3(LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY, entrynum, desc[0], desc[1]);
}
/* Changing to a different IDT is very rare: we keep the IDT up-to-date every
@@ -236,7 +255,7 @@ static void lguest_load_idt(const struct
struct desc_struct *idt = (void *)desc->address;
for (i = 0; i < (desc->size+1)/8; i++)
- hcall(LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY, i, idt[i].a, idt[i].b);
+ kvm_hypercall3(LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY, i, idt[i].a, idt[i].b);
}
/*
@@ -256,8 +275,8 @@ static void lguest_load_idt(const struct
*/
static void lguest_load_gdt(const struct desc_ptr *desc)
{
- BUG_ON((desc->size+1)/8 != GDT_ENTRIES);
- hcall(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(desc->address), GDT_ENTRIES, 0);
+ BUG_ON((desc->size + 1) / 8 != GDT_ENTRIES);
+ kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(desc->address), GDT_ENTRIES);
}
/* For a single GDT entry which changes, we do the lazy thing: alter our GDT,
@@ -267,7 +286,7 @@ static void lguest_write_gdt_entry(struc
const void *desc, int type)
{
native_write_gdt_entry(dt, entrynum, desc, type);
- hcall(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(dt), GDT_ENTRIES, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(dt), GDT_ENTRIES);
}
/* OK, I lied. There are three "thread local storage" GDT entries which change
@@ -279,7 +298,7 @@ static void lguest_load_tls(struct threa
* can't handle us removing entries we're currently using. So we clear
* the GS register here: if it's needed it'll be reloaded anyway. */
loadsegment(gs, 0);
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_LOAD_TLS, __pa(&t->tls_array), cpu, 0);
+ lazy_hcall2(LHCALL_LOAD_TLS, __pa(&t->tls_array), cpu);
}
/*G:038 That's enough excitement for now, back to ploughing through each of
@@ -377,7 +396,7 @@ static unsigned long current_cr0;
static unsigned long current_cr0;
static void lguest_write_cr0(unsigned long val)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_TS, val & X86_CR0_TS, 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_TS, val & X86_CR0_TS);
current_cr0 = val;
}
@@ -391,7 +410,7 @@ static unsigned long lguest_read_cr0(voi
* the vowels have been optimized out. */
static void lguest_clts(void)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_TS, 0, 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_TS, 0);
current_cr0 &= ~X86_CR0_TS;
}
@@ -413,7 +432,7 @@ static void lguest_write_cr3(unsigned lo
static void lguest_write_cr3(unsigned long cr3)
{
lguest_data.pgdir = cr3;
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_NEW_PGTABLE, cr3, 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_NEW_PGTABLE, cr3);
cr3_changed = true;
}
@@ -488,7 +507,7 @@ static void lguest_pte_update(struct mm_
static void lguest_pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
pte_t *ptep)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_SET_PTE, __pa(mm->pgd), addr, ptep->pte_low);
+ lazy_hcall3(LHCALL_SET_PTE, __pa(mm->pgd), addr, ptep->pte_low);
}
static void lguest_set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
@@ -504,8 +523,8 @@ static void lguest_set_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
static void lguest_set_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmdval)
{
*pmdp = pmdval;
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_SET_PMD, __pa(pmdp)&PAGE_MASK,
- (__pa(pmdp)&(PAGE_SIZE-1))/4, 0);
+ lazy_hcall2(LHCALL_SET_PMD, __pa(pmdp) & PAGE_MASK,
+ (__pa(pmdp) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) / 4);
}
/* There are a couple of legacy places where the kernel sets a PTE, but we
@@ -521,7 +540,7 @@ static void lguest_set_pte(pte_t *ptep,
{
*ptep = pteval;
if (cr3_changed)
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB, 1, 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB, 1);
}
/* Unfortunately for Lguest, the pv_mmu_ops for page tables were based on
@@ -537,7 +556,7 @@ static void lguest_flush_tlb_single(unsi
static void lguest_flush_tlb_single(unsigned long addr)
{
/* Simply set it to zero: if it was not, it will fault back in. */
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_SET_PTE, lguest_data.pgdir, addr, 0);
+ lazy_hcall3(LHCALL_SET_PTE, lguest_data.pgdir, addr, 0);
}
/* This is what happens after the Guest has removed a large number of entries.
@@ -545,7 +564,7 @@ static void lguest_flush_tlb_single(unsi
* have changed, ie. virtual addresses below PAGE_OFFSET. */
static void lguest_flush_tlb_user(void)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB, 0, 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB, 0);
}
/* This is called when the kernel page tables have changed. That's not very
@@ -553,14 +572,14 @@ static void lguest_flush_tlb_user(void)
* slow), so it's worth separating this from the user flushing above. */
static void lguest_flush_tlb_kernel(void)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB, 1, 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB, 1);
}
/* This routine is called when a process exits, and we're throwing away the
* page table. */
static void lguest_pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_INVALIDATE_PGTABLE, __pa(pgd), 0, 0);
+ lazy_hcall1(LHCALL_INVALIDATE_PGTABLE, __pa(pgd));
}
/*
@@ -697,7 +716,7 @@ static int lguest_clockevent_set_next_ev
}
/* Please wake us this far in the future. */
- hcall(LHCALL_SET_CLOCKEVENT, delta, 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall1(LHCALL_SET_CLOCKEVENT, delta);
return 0;
}
@@ -708,7 +727,7 @@ static void lguest_clockevent_set_mode(e
case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
/* A 0 argument shuts the clock down. */
- hcall(LHCALL_SET_CLOCKEVENT, 0, 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall0(LHCALL_SET_CLOCKEVENT);
break;
case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
/* This is what we expect. */
@@ -783,8 +802,8 @@ static void lguest_load_sp0(struct tss_s
static void lguest_load_sp0(struct tss_struct *tss,
struct thread_struct *thread)
{
- lazy_hcall(LHCALL_SET_STACK, __KERNEL_DS|0x1, thread->sp0,
- THREAD_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE);
+ lazy_hcall3(LHCALL_SET_STACK, __KERNEL_DS | 0x1, thread->sp0,
+ THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
}
/* Let's just say, I wouldn't do debugging under a Guest. */
@@ -856,7 +875,7 @@ static struct apic_ops lguest_basic_apic
/* STOP! Until an interrupt comes in. */
static void lguest_safe_halt(void)
{
- hcall(LHCALL_HALT, 0, 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall0(LHCALL_HALT);
}
/* The SHUTDOWN hypercall takes a string to describe what's happening, and
@@ -866,7 +885,8 @@ static void lguest_safe_halt(void)
* rather than virtual addresses, so we use __pa() here. */
static void lguest_power_off(void)
{
- hcall(LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, __pa("Power down"), LGUEST_SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, __pa("Power down"),
+ LGUEST_SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF);
}
/*
@@ -876,7 +896,7 @@ static void lguest_power_off(void)
*/
static int lguest_panic(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long l, void *p)
{
- hcall(LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, __pa(p), LGUEST_SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, __pa(p), LGUEST_SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF);
/* The hcall won't return, but to keep gcc happy, we're "done". */
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
@@ -917,7 +937,7 @@ static __init int early_put_chars(u32 vt
len = sizeof(scratch) - 1;
scratch[len] = '\0';
memcpy(scratch, buf, len);
- hcall(LHCALL_NOTIFY, __pa(scratch), 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall1(LHCALL_NOTIFY, __pa(scratch));
/* This routine returns the number of bytes actually written. */
return len;
@@ -927,7 +947,7 @@ static __init int early_put_chars(u32 vt
* Launcher to reboot us. */
static void lguest_restart(char *reason)
{
- hcall(LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, __pa(reason), LGUEST_SHUTDOWN_RESTART, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, __pa(reason), LGUEST_SHUTDOWN_RESTART);
}
/*G:050
diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/i386_head.S b/arch/x86/lguest/i386_head.S
--- a/arch/x86/lguest/i386_head.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lguest/i386_head.S
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ ENTRY(lguest_entry)
/* We make the "initialization" hypercall now to tell the Host about
* us, and also find out where it put our page tables. */
movl $LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT, %eax
- movl $lguest_data - __PAGE_OFFSET, %edx
- int $LGUEST_TRAP_ENTRY
+ movl $lguest_data - __PAGE_OFFSET, %ebx
+ .byte 0x0f,0x01,0xc1 /* KVM_HYPERCALL */
/* Set up the initial stack so we can run C code. */
movl $(init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE),%esp
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
@@ -288,9 +288,10 @@ static int direct_trap(unsigned int num)
/* The Host needs to see page faults (for shadow paging and to save the
* fault address), general protection faults (in/out emulation) and
- * device not available (TS handling), and of course, the hypercall
- * trap. */
- return num != 14 && num != 13 && num != 7 && num != LGUEST_TRAP_ENTRY;
+ * device not available (TS handling), invalid opcode fault (kvm hcall),
+ * and of course, the hypercall trap. */
+ return num != 14 && num != 13 && num != 7 &&
+ num != 6 && num != LGUEST_TRAP_ENTRY;
}
/*:*/
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c b/drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void set_status(struct virtio_dev
/* We set the status. */
to_lgdev(vdev)->desc->status = status;
- hcall(LHCALL_NOTIFY, (max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT) + offset, 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall1(LHCALL_NOTIFY, (max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset);
}
static void lg_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void lg_notify(struct virtqueue *
* virtqueue structure. */
struct lguest_vq_info *lvq = vq->priv;
- hcall(LHCALL_NOTIFY, lvq->config.pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 0, 0);
+ kvm_hypercall1(LHCALL_NOTIFY, lvq->config.pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
}
/* An extern declaration inside a C file is bad form. Don't do it. */
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c b/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c
@@ -290,6 +290,57 @@ static int emulate_insn(struct lg_cpu *c
return 1;
}
+/* Our hypercalls mechanism used to be based on direct software interrupts.
+ * After Anthony's "Refactor hypercall infrastructure" kvm patch, we decided to
+ * change over to using kvm hypercalls.
+ *
+ * KVM_HYPERCALL is actually a "vmcall" instruction, which generates an invalid
+ * opcode fault (fault 6) on non-VT cpus, so the easiest solution seemed to be
+ * an *emulation approach*: if the fault was really produced by an hypercall
+ * (is_hypercall() does exactly this check), we can just call the corresponding
+ * hypercall host implementation function.
+ *
+ * But these invalid opcode faults are notably slower than software interrupts.
+ * So we implemented the *patching (or rewriting) approach*: every time we hit
+ * the KVM_HYPERCALL opcode in Guest code, we patch it to the old "int 0x1f"
+ * opcode, so next time the Guest calls this hypercall it will use the
+ * faster trap mechanism.
+ *
+ * Matias even benchmarked it to convince you: this shows the average cycle
+ * cost of a hypercall. For each alternative solution mentioned above we've
+ * made 5 runs of the benchmark:
+ *
+ * 1) direct software interrupt: 2915, 2789, 2764, 2721, 2898
+ * 2) emulation technique: 3410, 3681, 3466, 3392, 3780
+ * 3) patching (rewrite) technique: 2977, 2975, 2891, 2637, 2884
+ *
+ * One two-line function is worth a 20% hypercall speed boost!
+ */
+static void rewrite_hypercall(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
+{
+ /* This are the opcodes we use to patch the Guest. The opcode for "int
+ * $0x1f" is "0xcd 0x1f" but vmcall instruction is 3 bytes long, so we
+ * complete the sequence with a NOP (0x90). */
+ u8 insn[3] = {0xcd, 0x1f, 0x90};
+
+ __lgwrite(cpu, guest_pa(cpu, cpu->regs->eip), insn, sizeof(insn));
+}
+
+static bool is_hypercall(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
+{
+ u8 insn[3];
+
+ /* This must be the Guest kernel trying to do something.
+ * The bottom two bits of the CS segment register are the privilege
+ * level. */
+ if ((cpu->regs->cs & 3) != GUEST_PL)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Is it a vmcall? */
+ __lgread(cpu, insn, guest_pa(cpu, cpu->regs->eip), sizeof(insn));
+ return insn[0] == 0x0f && insn[1] == 0x01 && insn[2] == 0xc1;
+}
+
/*H:050 Once we've re-enabled interrupts, we look at why the Guest exited. */
void lguest_arch_handle_trap(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
{
@@ -337,7 +388,7 @@ void lguest_arch_handle_trap(struct lg_c
break;
case 32 ... 255:
/* These values mean a real interrupt occurred, in which case
- * the Host handler has already been run. We just do a
+ * the Host handler has already been run. We just do a
* friendly check if another process should now be run, then
* return to run the Guest again */
cond_resched();
@@ -347,6 +398,15 @@ void lguest_arch_handle_trap(struct lg_c
* up the pointer now to indicate a hypercall is pending. */
cpu->hcall = (struct hcall_args *)cpu->regs;
return;
+ case 6:
+ /* kvm hypercalls trigger an invalid opcode fault (6).
+ * We need to check if ring == GUEST_PL and
+ * faulting instruction == vmcall. */
+ if (is_hypercall(cpu)) {
+ rewrite_hypercall(cpu);
+ return;
+ }
+ break;
}
/* We didn't handle the trap, so it needs to go to the Guest. */
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 23:52 Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-04-02 21:55 ` [Lguest] [PATCH 4/5] lguest: use KVM hypercalls Simon Holm Thøgersen
2009-04-02 21:55 ` Simon Holm Thøgersen
[not found] ` <1238709324.5823.8.camel-78RDdhuQolGs1BDpvl8NfQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-02 23:37 ` Matias Zabaljauregui
2009-04-02 23:37 ` [Lguest] " Matias Zabaljauregui
2009-04-03 9:28 ` Simon Holm Thøgersen
2009-04-03 9:28 ` [Lguest] " Simon Holm Thøgersen
2009-04-05 13:04 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-05 13:04 ` [Lguest] " Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <200904052234.48483.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-06 6:56 ` Simon Holm Thøgersen
2009-04-06 6:56 ` [Lguest] " Simon Holm Thøgersen
2009-04-08 16:24 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <1239043798.27826.93.camel@zetabook>
[not found] ` <200904081021.39877.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
[not found] ` <200904081021.39877.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-08 20:58 ` Matias Zabaljauregui
2009-04-09 10:32 ` Simon Holm Thøgersen
[not found] ` <1239273165.5687.10.camel-78RDdhuQolGs1BDpvl8NfQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-13 16:25 ` Matias Zabaljauregui
2009-04-15 8:42 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <200904151812.23318.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:55 ` Matias Zabaljauregui
2009-04-09 12:24 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <49DDE91A.8060603-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-09 13:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-09 13:59 ` [Lguest] " Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1bpr6hqrm.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-14 11:54 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <49E47976.8020005-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-14 17:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-15 8:36 ` [Lguest] " Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090415083610.GA8579-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 8:47 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-15 9:07 ` [Lguest] " Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-15 11:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-15 13:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m18wm2rqy6.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 13:28 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090415132802.GA11408-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 13:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1skkaox8h.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 13:46 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090415134610.GA11683-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 13:55 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090415135502.GA11827-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1ocuynh2f.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:12 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-15 14:06 ` [Lguest] " Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m11vruovu5.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:08 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090415140819.GA11991-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1iql6m24b.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:23 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-15 14:38 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090415143834.GA12384-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1zleiklsl.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-15 22:27 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-16 11:08 ` [1/2] tun: Only free a netdev when all tun descriptors are closed Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090416110818.GA20950-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-16 11:09 ` [2/2] tun: Fix sk_sleep races when attaching/detaching Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090416110952.GB20950-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-20 8:35 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-20 9:26 ` David Miller
2009-04-20 9:35 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-20 10:02 ` David Miller
2009-04-24 8:55 ` [1/2] tun: Only free a netdev when all tun descriptors are closed Christian Borntraeger
[not found] ` <200904241055.49794.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-24 12:11 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20090424121156.GA28039-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-24 12:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
[not found] ` <49DDF614.1060909-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-13 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] lguest: use KVM hypercalls Matias Zabaljauregui
2009-04-14 11:55 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903271022.38244.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty-8n+1lvoiyb80n/f98k4iww@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lguest-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=virtualization-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zabaljaureguiatgmail.com-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.