From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, roland@redhat.com,
eranian@googlemail.com, juan.villacis@intel.com,
ak@linux.jf.intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch 4/14] x86, ds: wait before freeing the DS configuration
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090327143556.GE14504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327095840.A11187@sedona.ch.intel.com>
On 03/27, Markus Metzger wrote:
>
> --- git-tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/ds.c 2009-03-27 07:59:23.000000000 +0100
> +++ git-tip/arch/x86/kernel/ds.c 2009-03-27 08:00:41.000000000 +0100
> @@ -783,6 +783,14 @@ void ds_release_bts(struct bts_tracer *t
>
> ds_suspend_bts(tracer);
>
> + /*
> + * We must wait for the suspend to take effect before we may
> + * free the tracer and the ds configuration.
> + */
> + if (tracer->ds.context->task &&
> + (tracer->ds.context->task != current))
> + wait_task_inactive(tracer->ds.context->task, 0);
> +
Since you didn't replay yet, I will just repeat my question ;)
I am not sure I understand the problem. From the changelog:
If the children are currently executing, the buffer
may be freed while the hardware is still tracing.
This might cause the hardware to overwrite memory.
So, the problem is that ds.context->task must not be running before we
can start to disable/free ds, yes? Something like ds_switch_to() should
be completed, right?
In that case I don't really understand how wait_task_inactive() can help.
If the task is killed it can be scheduled again, right after
wait_task_inactive() returns.
Also. This function is called from ptrace_bts_exit_tracer(), when the
tracee is not stopped. In this case wait_task_inactive() can spin forever.
For example, if the tracee simply does "for (;;) ;" it never succeeds.
If my understanding of the problem is wrong, could you please explain
it for dummies?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 8:58 [patch 4/14] x86, ds: wait before freeing the DS configuration Markus Metzger
2009-03-27 14:35 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-03-27 15:39 ` Metzger, Markus T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090327143556.GE14504@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=juan.villacis@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@gmail.com \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.