From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix c/s 18938
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:49:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903271749.15350.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CD0E0F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
This patch looks very good to me. Just one comment at the bottom.
Christoph
On Friday 27 March 2009 17:34:07 Jan Beulich wrote:
> Provide for up to 16/32 on (32/64-bit) extended MCE MSRs, and use
> actually existing extended MSRs on 64-bits that were inaccessible so
> far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> --- 2009-03-27.orig/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c 2009-03-27
> 16:43:26.000000000 +0100 +++
> 2009-03-27/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c 2009-03-27
> 12:06:52.000000000 +0100 @@ -117,6 +117,16 @@ static void
> intel_init_thermal(struct cp
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_MCE_THERMAL */
>
> +static inline void intel_get_extended_msr(struct mcinfo_extended *ext, u32
> msr) +{
> + if ( ext->mc_msrs < ARRAY_SIZE(ext->mc_msr)
> + && msr < MSR_IA32_MCG_EAX + nr_intel_ext_msrs ) {
> + ext->mc_msr[ext->mc_msrs].reg = msr;
> + rdmsrl(msr, ext->mc_msr[ext->mc_msrs].value);
> + ++ext->mc_msrs;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static enum mca_extinfo
> intel_get_extended_msrs(struct mc_info *mci, uint16_t bank, uint64_t
> status) {
> @@ -129,30 +139,29 @@ intel_get_extended_msrs(struct mc_info *
> memset(&mc_ext, 0, sizeof(struct mcinfo_extended));
> mc_ext.common.type = MC_TYPE_EXTENDED;
> mc_ext.common.size = sizeof(mc_ext);
> - mc_ext.mc_msrs = 10;
>
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[0].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EAX;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EAX, mc_ext.mc_msr[0].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[1].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EBX;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EBX, mc_ext.mc_msr[1].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[2].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_ECX;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_ECX, mc_ext.mc_msr[2].value);
> -
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[3].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EDX;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EDX, mc_ext.mc_msr[3].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[4].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_ESI;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_ESI, mc_ext.mc_msr[4].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[5].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EDI;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EDI, mc_ext.mc_msr[5].value);
> -
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[6].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EBP;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EBP, mc_ext.mc_msr[6].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[7].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_ESP;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_ESP, mc_ext.mc_msr[7].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[8].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EFLAGS;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EFLAGS, mc_ext.mc_msr[8].value);
> - mc_ext.mc_msr[9].reg = MSR_IA32_MCG_EIP;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_EIP, mc_ext.mc_msr[9].value);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EAX);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EBX);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_ECX);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EDX);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_ESI);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EDI);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EBP);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_ESP);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EFLAGS);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_EIP);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_MISC);
> +
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R8);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R9);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R10);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R11);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R12);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R13);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R14);
> + intel_get_extended_msr(&mc_ext, MSR_IA32_MCG_R15);
> +#endif
>
> x86_mcinfo_add(mci, &mc_ext);
>
> --- 2009-03-27.orig/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h 2009-03-27
> 16:43:26.000000000 +0100 +++
> 2009-03-27/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h 2009-03-27 13:18:04.000000000
> +0100 @@ -326,7 +326,15 @@
> #define MSR_IA32_MCG_ESP 0x00000187
> #define MSR_IA32_MCG_EFLAGS 0x00000188
> #define MSR_IA32_MCG_EIP 0x00000189
> -#define MSR_IA32_MCG_RESERVED 0x0000018a
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_MISC 0x0000018a
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R8 0x00000190
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R9 0x00000191
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R10 0x00000192
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R11 0x00000193
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R12 0x00000194
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R13 0x00000195
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R14 0x00000196
> +#define MSR_IA32_MCG_R15 0x00000197
>
> /* Pentium IV performance counter MSRs */
> #define MSR_P4_BPU_PERFCTR0 0x00000300
> --- 2009-03-27.orig/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen-mca.h 2009-03-27
> 16:47:30.000000000 +0100 +++
> 2009-03-27/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen-mca.h 2009-03-27
> 16:48:35.000000000 +0100 @@ -166,11 +166,11 @@ struct mcinfo_extended {
>
> uint32_t mc_msrs; /* Number of msr with valid values. */
> /*
> - * Currently Intel extended MSR (32/64) including all gp registers
> - * and E(R)DI, E(R)BP, E(R)SP, E(R)FLAGS, E(R)IP, E(R)MISC, only 10
> - * of them might be useful. So expend this array to 10.
> - */
> - struct mcinfo_msr mc_msr[10];
> + * Currently Intel extended MSR (32/64) include all gp registers
> + * and E(R)FLAGS, E(R)IP, E(R)MISC, up to 11/19 of them might be
> + * useful at present. So expand this array to 16/32 to leave room.
> + */
> + struct mcinfo_msr mc_msr[sizeof(void *) * 4];
Please make this a fixed sized array. There are users like Oracle who run
a 32bit PAE Dom0 on a 64bit Xen ...
> };
>
> /* Recovery Action flags. Giving recovery result information to DOM0 */
--
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jochen Polster, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 16:34 [PATCH] fix c/s 18938 Jan Beulich
2009-03-27 16:49 ` Christoph Egger [this message]
2009-03-27 17:08 ` Jan Beulich
2009-03-27 17:21 ` Christoph Egger
2009-03-30 7:14 ` Jan Beulich
2009-03-27 17:22 ` Frank van der Linden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903271749.15350.Christoph.Egger@amd.com \
--to=christoph.egger@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.