From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:07:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Intel DG45FC Message-Id: <20090328090748.78fe7d86@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <7bccedf10809181658o18aa47bbt46480ca2a67b1ac9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7bccedf10809181658o18aa47bbt46480ca2a67b1ac9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony, On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:14:16 -0700, Tony Bones wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Can you please look at your board (physically) and search for the > > Super-I/O chip? This should be one of: > > > > PC8374L > > WPCD374L > > WPCD376I > > WPCD377I > > > > I would like to know which one you have. > > Sorry for the long delay, its the WPCD376I (which apparently is based on > the WPCD374L but without the legacy components). So maybe they are similar > in how you interface with them. > > See here: > http://www.nuvoton.com/hq/enu/ProductAndSales/ProductLines/ComputerIC/SuperIO/AdvancedSuperIOforDesktop/WPCD376I.htm OK, thanks for the information. This confirms my guess that devices without the hardware monitoring block have revision ID 0x91. Please give a try to the latest version of sensors-detect: http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect It should detect a WPCD376I/377I and tell you it doesn't have hardware monitoring features. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors