From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86, mce: Add mce_threshold option for intel cmci
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:00:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090328120025.GA14464@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CC9FEC.6090300@jp.fujitsu.com>
* Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > The only potential reason for implementing this threshold at the
> > CPU level is if someone is concerned about CPU consumption
> > during error storms. But then the threshold should be
> > dynamically adjusted based on the current rate, otherwise it
> > doesn't help.
>
> So sysfs is required for such usage, right?
> I already have an another patch to have sysfs interface.
> I'll post it next time if it helps.
Yes, please post that patch too. I dont mind the boot parameter,
and it might be handy if the hw is misbehaving.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-28 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 8:39 [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86, mce: Add mce_threshold option for intel cmci Hidetoshi Seto
2009-03-26 9:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-27 9:44 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-03-27 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-30 9:06 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-03-30 10:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-31 7:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-03-31 8:15 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-28 12:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-28 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-30 9:42 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-31 2:45 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-03-31 8:08 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-31 2:45 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-01 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 4:43 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-02 4:54 ` [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86, mce: Revert "add mce_threshold option for intel cmci" Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-02 4:55 ` [PATCH -tip 2/3] x86, mce: Revert "add mce=nopoll option to disable timer polling" Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-02 4:58 ` [PATCH -tip 3/3] x86, mce: Add new option mce=no_cmci and mce=ignore_ce Hidetoshi Seto
2009-03-28 21:28 ` [tip:x86/mce2] x86, mce: Add mce_threshold option for intel cmci Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090328120025.GA14464@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.