All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: remove wrong ifdef
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:37:47 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903281937.48755.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CDAB6E.90006@kernel.org>

On Saturday 28 March 2009 15:15:34 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Impact: fix smp_affinity copying
> 
> CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK is not defined anywhere.
> and init_allocate_desc_masks called before it set affinity to all cpus...
> 
> just remove those #idef to make them get copied
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/irq.h |    4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -468,20 +468,16 @@ static inline bool init_alloc_desc_masks
>   * @new_desc:	pointer to new irq_desc struct
>   *
>   * Insures affinity and pending_masks are copied to new irq_desc.
> - * If !CONFIG_CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK the cpumasks are embedded in the
> - * irq_desc struct so the copy is redundant.
>   */
>  
>  static inline void init_copy_desc_masks(struct irq_desc *old_desc,
>  					struct irq_desc *new_desc)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK
>  	cpumask_copy(new_desc->affinity, old_desc->affinity);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
>  	cpumask_copy(new_desc->pending_mask, old_desc->pending_mask);
>  #endif
> -#endif
>  }
>  
>  #else /* !CONFIG_SMP */

Wow, that is supposed to be CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.

The reason it is there is that we already do the memcpy of old_desc: this
extra copy is only needed if the cpumasks are external.  But perhaps it's
an over-optimization.

Thanks,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-28  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-28  4:44 [PATCH] irq: only update affinity in chip set_affinity() Yinghai Lu
2009-03-28  4:45 ` [PATCH] irq: remove wrong ifdef Yinghai Lu
2009-03-28  9:07   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-03-28 20:09     ` [PATCH] irq: correct CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK typo -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-29  2:03       ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-28 20:12     ` [PATCH] irq: remove wrong ifdef Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903281937.48755.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.