From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1LntXt-0007lF-BT for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:51:21 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LntXr-0007kS-KN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:51:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LntXp-0007jL-VR for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:51:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47487 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LntXp-0007jA-Lx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:51:17 -0400 Received: from mail.nexedi.com ([91.121.25.85]:48887 helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LntXp-0005kL-Ax for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:51:17 -0400 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226B53D9F8 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:51:15 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:51:07 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <49CF5318.2070607@nic.fi> <49CF5C9C.20208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49CF5C9C.20208@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903292051.07210.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split of the normal mode X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:51:19 -0000 On Sunday 29 March 2009 20:33:48 phcoder wrote: > I agree when it's about big changes. I wouldalso not commit anything > what isn't quite tested or may break something. But when one-line > bugfixes stay uncommited during 2-3 weaks it's something that isn't > quite ok. Also if noone comments a relatively small patch in 1-2 weeks I > think we should consider that everybody is happy with the patch and it > should be commited. However somehow on this project it's not the same > rules for everyone. You are right. For very small, trivial patches, I will fix the problem by giving the write permission to you. For complex or big patches, I recommend that you use the bug tracker on Savannah. I know that not many people use it, but putting patches on the mailing list is not quite convenient when we have a huge backlog. The discussion can be still done in the mailing list, but I need an easy way to glance at a list of all pending patches. Is this good enough for you? Regards, Okuji