From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Bernhard Kohl <bernhard.kohl@nsn.com>,
"Ostler, Thomas (NSN - DE/Munich)" <thomas.ostler@nsn.com>,
bliitz@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Fix task switching.
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:39:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090330163942.GK25718@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D0F4B9.5040008@web.de>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:35:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> The patch fixes two problems with task switching.
> >>> 1. Back link is written to a wrong TSS.
> >>> 2. Instruction emulation is not needed if the reason for task switch
> >>> is a task gate in IDT and access to it is caused by an external even.
> >>>
> >>> 2 is currently solved only for VMX since there is not reliable way to
> >>> skip an instruction in SVM. We should emulate it instead.
> >> Does this series fix all issues Bernhard, Thomas and Julian stumbled over?
> >>
> > Haven't tried. I wrote my own tests for task switching. How can I check it?
> >
>
> There is a test case attached to Julian's sourceforge-reported bug:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2681442&group_id=180599
>
I'll try that.
> And I guess Thomas or Bernhard will be happy to give it a try, too... :)
>
> There was one issue, the IRQ injection bug [1] which was related to IRQ
> tasks IIRC. Thomas and I finally suspected after a private chat that
> there is actually a different reason behind it, something like
> interrupt.pending should be cleared when the injection took place via an
> (emulated) task switch. Any news on this, Thomas?
>
If this is the case then the patch series should fix it.
> Jan
>
> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/29288
>
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-30 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-29 14:12 [PATCH 1/4] Fix handling of a fault during NMI unblocked due to IRET Gleb Natapov
2009-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] Rewrite twisted maze of if() statements with more straightforward switch() Gleb Natapov
2009-03-30 7:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-30 16:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] Do not zero idt_vectoring_info in vmx_complete_interrupts() Gleb Natapov
2009-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] Fix task switching Gleb Natapov
2009-03-30 7:39 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-30 13:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-03-30 16:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-30 16:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-03-30 16:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-30 16:39 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2009-03-30 16:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-03-30 23:54 ` Julian Stecklina
2009-03-31 9:03 ` Kohl, Bernhard (NSN - DE/Munich)
2009-03-31 15:21 ` Kohl, Bernhard (NSN - DE/Munich)
2009-03-31 15:22 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-04-01 7:21 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090330163942.GK25718@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=bernhard.kohl@nsn.com \
--cc=bliitz@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.ostler@nsn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.