From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: roland@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: + signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:18:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903302218.n2UMIvEb004737@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
signals: tracehook_notify_jctl change
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: signals: tracehook_notify_jctl change
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
This changes tracehook_notify_jctl() so it's called with the siglock held,
and changes its argument and return value definition. These clean-ups
make it a better fit for what new tracing hooks need to check.
Tracing needs the siglock here, held from the time TASK_STOPPED was set,
to avoid potential SIGCONT races if it wants to allow any blocking in its
tracing hooks.
This also folds the finish_stop() function into its caller
do_signal_stop(). The function is short, called only once and only
unconditionally. It aids readability to fold it in.
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/tracehook.h | 25 ++++++++-----
kernel/signal.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/tracehook.h~signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change include/linux/tracehook.h
--- a/include/linux/tracehook.h~signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change
+++ a/include/linux/tracehook.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/*
* Tracing hooks
*
- * Copyright (C) 2008 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (C) 2008-2009 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
*
* This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use,
* modify, copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions
@@ -464,22 +464,29 @@ static inline int tracehook_get_signal(s
/**
* tracehook_notify_jctl - report about job control stop/continue
- * @notify: nonzero if this is the last thread in the group to stop
+ * @notify: zero, %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED
* @why: %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED
*
* This is called when we might call do_notify_parent_cldstop().
- * It's called when about to stop for job control; we are already in
- * %TASK_STOPPED state, about to call schedule(). It's also called when
- * a delayed %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED report is ready to be made.
*
- * Return nonzero to generate a %SIGCHLD with @why, which is
- * normal if @notify is nonzero.
+ * @notify is zero if we would not ordinarily send a %SIGCHLD,
+ * or is the %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED .si_code for %SIGCHLD.
*
- * Called with no locks held.
+ * @why is %CLD_STOPPED when about to stop for job control;
+ * we are already in %TASK_STOPPED state, about to call schedule().
+ * It might also be that we have just exited (check %PF_EXITING),
+ * but need to report that a group-wide stop is complete.
+ *
+ * @why is %CLD_CONTINUED when waking up after job control stop and
+ * ready to make a delayed @notify report.
+ *
+ * Return the %CLD_* value for %SIGCHLD, or zero to generate no signal.
+ *
+ * Called with the siglock held.
*/
static inline int tracehook_notify_jctl(int notify, int why)
{
- return notify || (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED);
+ return notify ?: (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) ? why : 0;
}
#define DEATH_REAP -1
diff -puN kernel/signal.c~signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change kernel/signal.c
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struc
if (why) {
/*
- * The first thread which returns from finish_stop()
+ * The first thread which returns from do_signal_stop()
* will take ->siglock, notice SIGNAL_CLD_MASK, and
* notify its parent. See get_signal_to_deliver().
*/
@@ -1665,29 +1665,6 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code)
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
}
-static void
-finish_stop(int stop_count)
-{
- /*
- * If there are no other threads in the group, or if there is
- * a group stop in progress and we are the last to stop,
- * report to the parent. When ptraced, every thread reports itself.
- */
- if (tracehook_notify_jctl(stop_count == 0, CLD_STOPPED)) {
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_STOPPED);
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- }
-
- do {
- schedule();
- } while (try_to_freeze());
- /*
- * Now we don't run again until continued.
- */
- current->exit_code = 0;
-}
-
/*
* This performs the stopping for SIGSTOP and other stop signals.
* We have to stop all threads in the thread group.
@@ -1698,6 +1675,7 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
{
struct signal_struct *sig = current->signal;
int stop_count;
+ int notify;
if (sig->group_stop_count > 0) {
/*
@@ -1737,8 +1715,30 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
current->exit_code = sig->group_exit_code;
__set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED);
+ /*
+ * If there are no other threads in the group, or if there is
+ * a group stop in progress and we are the last to stop,
+ * report to the parent. When ptraced, every thread reports itself.
+ */
+ notify = tracehook_notify_jctl(stop_count == 0 ? CLD_STOPPED : 0,
+ CLD_STOPPED);
+
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- finish_stop(stop_count);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, notify);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ }
+
+ do {
+ schedule();
+ } while (try_to_freeze());
+ /*
+ * Now we don't run again until continued.
+ */
+ current->exit_code = 0;
+
return 1;
}
@@ -1807,14 +1807,15 @@ relock:
int why = (signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_CONTINUED)
? CLD_CONTINUED : CLD_STOPPED;
signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_CLD_MASK;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
- if (unlikely(!tracehook_notify_jctl(1, why)))
- goto relock;
+ why = tracehook_notify_jctl(why, CLD_CONTINUED);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- do_notify_parent_cldstop(current->group_leader, why);
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ if (why) {
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ do_notify_parent_cldstop(current->group_leader, why);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ }
goto relock;
}
@@ -1979,14 +1980,14 @@ void exit_signals(struct task_struct *ts
if (unlikely(tsk->signal->group_stop_count) &&
!--tsk->signal->group_stop_count) {
tsk->signal->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED;
- group_stop = 1;
+ group_stop = tracehook_notify_jctl(CLD_STOPPED, CLD_STOPPED);
}
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
- if (unlikely(group_stop) && tracehook_notify_jctl(1, CLD_STOPPED)) {
+ if (unlikely(group_stop)) {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- do_notify_parent_cldstop(tsk, CLD_STOPPED);
+ do_notify_parent_cldstop(tsk, group_stop);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from roland@redhat.com are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
do_wait-fix-waiting-for-the-group-stop-with-the-dead-leader.patch
signals-remove-handler-parameter-to-tracehook-functions.patch
signals-protect-init-from-unwanted-signals-more.patch
signals-add-from_ancestor_ns-parameter-to-send_signal.patch
signals-protect-cinit-from-unblocked-sig_dfl-signals.patch
signals-zap_pid_ns_process-should-use-force_sig.patch
signals-protect-cinit-from-blocked-fatal-signals.patch
signals-si_user-masquerade-si_pid-when-crossing-pid-ns-boundary.patch
ptrace-kill-__ptrace_detach-fix-exit_state-check.patch
ptrace-simplify-ptrace_exit-ignoring_children-path.patch
ptrace-simplify-ptrace_exit-ignoring_children-pathpatch-fix.patch
ptrace-reintroduce-__ptrace_detach-as-a-callee-of-ptrace_exit.patch
ptrace-reintroduce-__ptrace_detach-as-a-callee-of-ptrace_exit-fix.patch
ptrace-fix-possible-zombie-leak-on-ptrace_detach.patch
reparent_thread-dont-call-kill_orphaned_pgrp-if-task_detached.patch
reparent_thread-fix-the-is-it-traced-check.patch
reparent_thread-fix-a-zombie-leak-if-sbin-init-ignores-sigchld.patch
forget_original_parent-split-out-the-un-ptrace-part.patch
forget_original_parent-do-not-abuse-child-ptrace_entry.patch
forget_original_parent-do-not-abuse-child-ptrace_entry-fix.patch
tracehook_notify_death-use-task_detached-helper.patch
ptrace_detach-the-wrong-wakeup-breaks-the-erestartxxx-logic.patch
ptrace_untrace-fix-the-signal_stop_stopped-check.patch
pids-document-task_pgrp-task_session-is-not-safe-without-tasklist-rcu.patch
pids-document-task_pgrp-task_session-is-not-safe-without-tasklist-rcu-fix.patch
pids-improve-get_task_pid-to-fix-the-unsafe-sys_wait4-task_pgrp.patch
pids-refactor-vnr-nr_ns-helpers-to-make-them-safe.patch
pids-kill-now-unused-signal_struct-__pgrp-__session-and-friends.patch
signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch
utrace-core.patch
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-30 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-30 22:18 akpm [this message]
2009-04-01 12:36 ` + signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch added to -mm tree Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 18:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903302218.n2UMIvEb004737@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.