From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30 (Blackfin string failures again)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:48:14 +1030
Message-ID: <200903311248.14413.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <8bd0f97a0903301726j536da9aciaf9eb5e9a7afff5@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:47274 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755858AbZCaCSW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:18:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0903301726j536da9aciaf9eb5e9a7afff5@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Tuesday 31 March 2009 10:56:40 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > The rr tree lost 8 conflicts.
> 
> was the Blackfin changes related to the string updates lost or
> something ?  the March 30 tree brought in these failures again ...

Sorry, you're right.  I dropped all the arch-specific stuff, I should
have kept that since it had your tested-by.

I'll send to Linus now.
Rusty.