Re: + mm-remove-struct-mm_struct-exe_file-et-al.patch added to -mm tree

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

s/mm-commits/lkml/

On 03/30, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
>
> Commit 925d1c401fa6cfd0df5d2e37da8981494ccdec07 ("procfs task exe
> symlink").  introduced struct mm_struct::exe_file and struct
> mm_struct::num_exe_file_vmas.
>
> The rationale is weak: unifying MMU and no-MMU version of /proc/*/exe
> code.  For this a) struct mm_struct becomes bigger, b) mmap/munmap/exit
> become slower, c) patch adds more code than removes in fact.
>
> ->exe_file maybe well defined, but doesn't make sense always.  After
> original executable is unmapped, /proc/*/exe will still report it and,
> more importantly, pin corresponding struct file.

I never liked the change which introduced mm->exe_file, so I vote for
this patch.

But, as a advocatus diaboli... There was anotrher reason for ->exe_file,
iirc.

bprm->file->f_op->mmap() can change vma->vm_file, this means proc_exe_link()
can report the "wrong" path. The original file is not pinned in this case.

Matt?

Oleg.