From: Simon Hengel <simon.hengel@wiktory.org>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: vi-like key bindings for alsamixer
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:50:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090402155034.GA5790@john> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D46195.5030609@ladisch.de>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:56:21AM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > Is this deemed suitable for the masses?
>
> _Undocumented_ commands certainly aren't. ;-)
This is certainly true.
While working on documentation I realized that '+' and KEY_UP, contrary
to what is documented, do different things.
'+' increases volume by 1% whereas KEY_UP increases volume by 2%.
So actually it is like:
W | + increase volume by 1%
w | KEY_UP increase volume by 2%
X | - decrease volume by 1%
x | KEY_DOWN decrease volume by 2%
Still this makes no difference with my hardware, as the granularity is >
3% (e.g. snd_mixer_selem_get_playback_volume_range gives {0, 31} or {0,
15} for {min, max}).
I wonder if it would be a good idea to unify it. Consequently one could
do the same for left & right levels.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-01 19:58 vi-like key bindings for alsamixer Simon Hengel
2009-04-01 19:58 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils] Added vi-like key bindings to alsamixer Simon Hengel
2009-04-02 6:56 ` vi-like key bindings for alsamixer Clemens Ladisch
2009-04-02 15:50 ` Simon Hengel [this message]
2009-04-02 16:05 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils 1/2] alsamixer - unified behavior of volume control keys Simon Hengel
2009-04-02 16:05 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils 2/2] alsamixer - unified behavior of volume keys for left & right levels Simon Hengel
2009-04-20 12:56 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils 1/2] alsamixer - unified behavior of volume control keys Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090402155034.GA5790@john \
--to=simon.hengel@wiktory.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.