From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n33Icirl025570 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:38:44 -0400 Received: from sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n33IchfC008586 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:38:43 GMT Received: from dm-central-02.central.sun.com ([129.147.62.5]) by sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n33Icgn1025962 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:38:42 GMT Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by dm-central-02.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n33IcgB1010960 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:38:42 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:36:55 -0500 From: Nicolas Williams To: Santosh Chokhani Cc: saag@ietf.org, labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org, nfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4) Message-ID: <20090403173655.GK1500@Sun.COM> References: <20090402154402.GM1500@Sun.COM> <20090403154253.GZ1500@Sun.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:34:23PM -0400, Santosh Chokhani wrote: > The work I am mentioning was done for NSA and can be released if NSA is > ok with it. > > I suspect NSA will be ok with it. Great! But I was referring to the ISO15816 spec -- that does not belong to the NSA, though the NSA might be able to pull strings to make it a free spec. It took so long to make the ASN.1 specs free that I wouldn't hold my breath. I may be better for the IETF to start over on a replacement for SPIF. Nico -- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.