From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.149.226.213] (helo=smtp.host4.kei.pl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lqoue-0004FP-HX for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:31:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 27640 invoked by uid 813007); 6 Apr 2009 13:28:05 -0000 X-clamdmail: clamdmail 0.18a Received: from 195.149.226.213 (HELO home.localnet) (marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl@195.149.226.213) by 195.149.226.213 with ESMTPA; 6 Apr 2009 13:28:05 -0000 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:28:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <49D9FE37.9040005@bolloretelecom.eu> In-Reply-To: <49D9FE37.9040005@bolloretelecom.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200904061528.05390.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 195.149.226.213 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Package "pine" has multiple issues X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:31:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dnia poniedzia=C5=82ek, 6 kwietnia 2009 o 15:05:59 Jeremy Lain=C3=A9 napisa= =C5=82(a): > While doing some QA work I came up with the following problems: > > * RDEPENDS_pine =3D "pico" : this looks wrong, should probably be a > "+=3D" * pine embeds a copy of libc-client, which is already available > as a separate package > * LDFLAGS are ignored, resulting in a QA error I think that we should drop it totally and use Alpine instead. Why? =2D Pine is not developed anymore =2D Pine has license which do not allows to distribute changed binaries =2D Alpine replaced Pine =2D Alpine uses Apache License 2.0 > As I can't find "pine" in the MAINTAINERS file, could someone step > forward and fix it please? IIRC Mickeyl added it long time ago. Regards,=20 =2D-=20 JID: hrw@jabber.org Website: http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinjuszkiewicz