From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sven Schuetz <sven@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James.Smart@Emulex.Com, Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2] zfcp: Set WKA-port to offline on adapter deactivation
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090406163534.533486000@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090406163145.686874000@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: 704-zfcp-wka-port.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4027 bytes --]
From: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
The nameserver port might be in state online when the adapter is
offlined. On adapter reactivation the nameserver port is not
re-opened due to the PORT_ONLINE status. This results in an
unsuccessful recovery. In forcing the nameserver port status
to offline on all adapter offline events this issue is prevented.
Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c | 3 ++-
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ccw.c | 1 -
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c 2009-04-06 17:20:50.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c 2009-04-06 17:22:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -525,6 +525,8 @@ int zfcp_adapter_enqueue(struct ccw_devi
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_REMOVE, &adapter->status);
+ zfcp_fc_nameserver_init(adapter);
+
if (!zfcp_adapter_scsi_register(adapter))
return 0;
@@ -553,7 +555,6 @@ void zfcp_adapter_dequeue(struct zfcp_ad
cancel_work_sync(&adapter->scan_work);
cancel_work_sync(&adapter->stat_work);
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&adapter->nsp.work);
zfcp_adapter_scsi_unregister(adapter);
sysfs_remove_group(&adapter->ccw_device->dev.kobj,
&zfcp_sysfs_adapter_attrs);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ccw.c 2009-04-06 17:20:50.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ccw.c 2009-04-06 17:22:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static int zfcp_ccw_set_online(struct cc
/* initialize request counter */
BUG_ON(!zfcp_reqlist_isempty(adapter));
adapter->req_no = 0;
- zfcp_fc_nameserver_init(adapter);
zfcp_erp_modify_adapter_status(adapter, "ccsonl1", NULL,
ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_RUNNING, ZFCP_SET);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c 2009-04-06 17:07:10.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c 2009-04-06 17:22:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ static void zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_cl
zfcp_qdio_close(adapter);
zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all(adapter);
adapter->fsf_req_seq_no = 0;
+ zfcp_fc_wka_port_force_offline(&adapter->nsp);
/* all ports and units are closed */
zfcp_erp_modify_adapter_status(adapter, "erascl1", NULL,
ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN, ZFCP_CLEAR);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h 2009-04-06 17:20:50.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h 2009-04-06 17:22:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ extern void zfcp_fc_plogi_evaluate(struc
extern void zfcp_test_link(struct zfcp_port *);
extern void zfcp_fc_link_test_work(struct work_struct *);
extern void zfcp_fc_nameserver_init(struct zfcp_adapter *);
+extern void zfcp_fc_wka_port_force_offline(struct zfcp_wka_port *);
/* zfcp_fsf.c */
extern int zfcp_fsf_open_port(struct zfcp_erp_action *);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c 2009-04-06 17:20:50.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c 2009-04-06 17:22:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -98,12 +98,8 @@ static void zfcp_wka_port_offline(struct
struct zfcp_wka_port *wka_port =
container_of(dw, struct zfcp_wka_port, work);
- /* Don't wait forvever. If the wka_port is too busy take it offline
- through a new call later */
- if (!wait_event_timeout(wka_port->completion_wq,
- atomic_read(&wka_port->refcount) == 0,
- HZ >> 1))
- return;
+ wait_event(wka_port->completion_wq,
+ atomic_read(&wka_port->refcount) == 0);
mutex_lock(&wka_port->mutex);
if ((atomic_read(&wka_port->refcount) != 0) ||
@@ -142,6 +138,14 @@ void zfcp_fc_nameserver_init(struct zfcp
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&wka_port->work, zfcp_wka_port_offline);
}
+void zfcp_fc_wka_port_force_offline(struct zfcp_wka_port *wka)
+{
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wka->work);
+ mutex_lock(&wka->mutex);
+ wka->status = ZFCP_WKA_PORT_OFFLINE;
+ mutex_unlock(&wka->mutex);
+}
+
static void _zfcp_fc_incoming_rscn(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req, u32 range,
struct fcp_rscn_element *elem)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 16:31 [patch 0/2] FC pass-through support for zfcp Christof Schmitt
2009-04-06 16:31 ` Christof Schmitt [this message]
2009-04-06 16:31 ` [patch 2/2] zfcp: Add FC pass-through support Christof Schmitt
2009-04-07 23:17 ` James Smart
2009-04-08 7:39 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-04-08 11:29 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-04-08 11:38 ` Christof Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090406163534.533486000@de.ibm.com \
--to=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sven@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=swen@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.