From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Lqz9A-0005vq-2M for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:36 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lqz98-0005vl-S9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lqz97-0005vZ-FQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46747 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lqz97-0005vW-An for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:33 -0400 Received: from mail.nexedi.com ([91.121.25.85]:40899 helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lqz96-00083J-WF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:33 -0400 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B93D9FE for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:26:30 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:26:29 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <49DA03D6.2020909@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49DA03D6.2020909@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904070926.30065.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: UFS fixes X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:26:35 -0000 On Monday 06 April 2009 22:29:58 phcoder wrote: > Here are the fixes for UFS. Basically it's a resubmit of my previous > patch. It works fine with both solaris UFS and recent BSD UFS2. Does it > break anything for anyone with ufs? I don't have UFS, but the patch looks good to me. Regards, Okuji > 2009-04-06 Vladimir Serbinenko > > UFS improvements > > * fs/ufs.c (INODE_NBLOCKS): new definition > (struct grub_ufs_dirent): added fields for non-BSD dirents > (grub_ufs_get_file_block): fixed double indirect handling > (grub_ufs_lookup_symlink): use more robust way to determine whether > symlink is inline > (grub_ufs_find_file): support for non-BSD dirents > (grub_ufs_dir): support for non-BSD dirents