From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756098AbZDGL0b (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:26:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753816AbZDGL0V (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:26:21 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:37864 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331AbZDGL0V (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:26:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:58:35 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , Peter Zijlstra , David Miller , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [RFC] Static/Runtime CPU/IO bound scheduling polices based on CPU(s) to support complete spectrum of tasks Message-ID: <20090407105835.GP17934@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1239099931.4773.25.camel@ht.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1239099931.4773.25.camel@ht.satnam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:55:31PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > I am planning to prepare the followings: This seems all quite vague. Perhaps it would be good if you started with a clear definition what problem you're trying to solve. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.