From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: usb.current tree build failure Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:20:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20090408022039.GA13392@kroah.com> References: <20090408101007.40822ec6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090408014830.GA13223@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:53688 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754915AbZDHCW7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:22:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090408014830.GA13223@kroah.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, David Vrabel On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:48:30PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:10:07AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/block/ub.c: In function 'ub_scsi_urb_compl': > > drivers/block/ub.c:1052: error: implicit declaration of function 'usb_settoggle' > > > > Caused by commit 876d77e4521ff2b4f937bf7104bf70d2d105b0c2 ("USB: add > > reset endpoint operations") from the usb.current tree. > > > > I have used the version of that tree from next-20090407. (Which means I > > need to do the same for the driver-core, usb and staring trees that > > depend on the usb.current tree.) > > I think I'll just drop these patches, as this isn't ok. > > David, care to respin these and resend them to me? I'll have to drop > your whole series :( I've now dropped your 6 patches and pushed out a new series so that linux-next will build properly with the usb tree in it tomorrow. Stephen, sorry for the trouble. greg k-h