From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932329AbZDHNDG (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:03:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932289AbZDHNCk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:02:40 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49111 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932277AbZDHNCi (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:02:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:02:17 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Cyrill Gorcunov , Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , Suresh Siddha Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: do_IRQ - send EOI for x86-32 on irq without handler Message-ID: <20090408130217.GL18581@elte.hu> References: <20090403185729.GC12273@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090403185729.GC12273@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > For X86-32 if IRQ has no handler it remains non-Ack'ed > even if APIC is not requested for being disabled. > Fix it. nice fix. Did you observe any real hangs in such a situation, or is this via code review? Ingo