From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.173.1] (helo=vms173001pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LreBW-0006vV-MM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:16:01 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.255.242.201]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KHS00ILYTH324V6@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:12:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 047936B83B5; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:12:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:12:38 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20090408201238.GI14502@denix.org> References: <1239036500-32115-1-git-send-email-jeremy.laine@bolloretelecom.eu> <20090408004514.GI11203@denix.org> <49DC6CB1.7080205@bolloretelecom.eu> <20090408185813.GD14502@denix.org> <49DD0366.8000202@bolloretelecom.eu> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <49DD0366.8000202@bolloretelecom.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.46.173.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: denis@denix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05, FM_FAKE_HELO_VERIZON,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [STABLE][PATCH] gsoap: actually stage headers and libraries.. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:16:13 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:04:54PM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote: > > Overall it looks Ok to me. But I have 2 questions about a proper procedure: > > - should the .dev have the same fix? > > - should PR be incremented by 1? > > Yes, the dev branch has the exact same .bb file. In fact the patch is simply the diff > between stable and dev. Sorry, I missed it in .dev - both questions retracted. Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko -- Denys