All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
To: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer overflow in config parser
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:10:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904101810.54774.markus.heidelberg@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904090959.28646.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>

Thomas Jarosch, 09.04.2009:
> On Thursday, 9. April 2009 01:15:17 Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> > > > index b76fe4c..a9c67e8 100644
> > > > --- a/config.c
> > > > +++ b/config.c
> > > > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static char *parse_value(void)
> > > >                         }
> > > >                 }
> > > >                 if (space) {
> > > > -                       if (len)
> > > > +                       if (len && len < sizeof(value)-1)
> > > >                                 value[len++] = ' ';
> > > >                         space = 0;
> >
> > Eh, or maybe better add a "continue;" here, so that only one char per
> > loop is read.
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> If I understand the intention of the complete code correctly, the idea was
> to read in 1+ spaces and put -one- space in the buffer as soon as the first
> non-space character is encountered (if not inside quotes).
> 
> Adding a "continue" statement would eat up the first non-space character.

Yes, you are right, I judged to quickly.

> I guess it's ok to modify the first size check or keep to problem local and 
> check the size before putting the space in the buffer.

Keeping the problem local would mean to add this check to the end of the
"for" loop before "value[len++] = c;" where the overflow actually
happens.
OTOH this overflow only occurs within a whitespace area, so from this
POV it is local at this place.

I think the cleanest solution would be to decrease the existing check at
the top by 1, even if then the maximum length will be decreased. But
there is no hint in the docs about it anyway.

> Guess that's up to
> the maintainer which method he prefers.

Take what you think is the best solution and convince him :)

Markus

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-10 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08 22:13 [PATCH] Fix buffer overflow in config parser Thomas Jarosch
2009-04-08 22:58 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-04-08 23:15   ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-04-09  7:59     ` Thomas Jarosch
2009-04-10 16:10       ` Markus Heidelberg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904101810.54774.markus.heidelberg@web.de \
    --to=markus.heidelberg@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.