All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:53:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414065303.GA24626@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090414153035.C662.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>


* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> > Impact: allow filtering by lock name / fix module tracing
> > 
> > Currently, the "lock acquired" event is traced using a TRACE_EVENT.
> > But we can't use the char * type for the name without risking to
> > dereference a freed pointer. A lock name can come from a module
> > towards lockdep and it is risky to only store its address because we
> > defer its name printing.
> 
> When released lockdep string table? I guess it only happend at 
> module unloading. if so, we should consider to make delayed string 
> table freeing at module unloading.
> 
> My point is, module unloading is rare event. thus meking pointer 
> safe mechanism widely avoid string copy.
> 
> IOW, if not, ringbuffer is filled tons string. it kill the merit 
> of binary buffer and current design.

We could zap all pending trace entries on module unload (it is a 
rare operation). That would indeed make a whole category of 
symbol-alike string pointers safe to be passed by value.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-13 22:36 [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 22:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 22:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14  7:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-14 10:27     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 21:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 23:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14  0:24   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-14  6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-14  6:53   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-14  6:56     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-14  7:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-14 10:25       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-17 17:25     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 17:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 17:36         ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 20:29           ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090414065303.GA24626@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.