From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] interrupt injection rework
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:37:39 +0300
Message-ID: <20090414153739.GF20739@redhat.com>
References: <1239616545-25199-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <20090414153349.GK1141@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, sheng@linux.intel.com
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:54034 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751560AbZDNPhn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:37:43 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090414153349.GK1141@amd.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:33:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Gleb,
>=20
> I am just curious, have you given these patches some stress testing w=
ith all
> kinds of Windows guests? To my experience they break very fast if som=
ething is
> wrong with interrupts ;)
>=20
I tested VMX with windows XP/vista64 and SVM with windows 2003/Vista64,=
 but
SVM is tested much less then VMX.

> Joerg
>=20
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:55:30PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > This patch series aims to consolidate IRQ injection code for in ker=
nel
> > IRQ chip and userspace one. Also to move IRQ injection logic from
> > SVM/VMX specific code to x86.c.
>=20
> --=20
>            | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
>  Operating | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach bei M=C3=BCnch=
en
>  System    |=20
>  Research  | Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Jochen Polster, Thomas M. McC=
oy, Giuliano Meroni
>  Center    | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis M=C3=BCnchen
>            | Registergericht M=C3=BCnchen, HRB Nr. 43632

--
			Gleb.