From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Print sched_group::__cpu_power in sched_domain_debug
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:36:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414170621.GA1733@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA39B3CF29A@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:29:53AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> - printk(KERN_CONT " %s (__cpu_power = %d)", str,
> - group->__cpu_power);
> + if (group->__cpu_power != SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
> + printk(KERN_CONT " %s (__cpu_power = %d)", str,
> + group->__cpu_power);
>
> Much quieter ... but perhaps a little too quiet?
> Is this what you want? Now the console output looks like this:
>
> CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> domain 0: span 0-15 level CPU
> groups:
> CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> domain 0: span 0-15 level CPU
> groups:
> CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> domain 0: span 0-15 level CPU
> groups:
> ...
>
> instead of the original:
>
> CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> domain 0: span 0-15 level CPU
> groups: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
> CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> domain 0: span 0-15 level CPU
> groups: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0
> CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> domain 0: span 0-15 level CPU
> groups: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1
> ...
>
> Either we don't need the empty "groups:" line, or we should
> still list the cpus in the group? I'm not really sure what
> information you are trying to convey here.
We should be listing the cpus in the group. We should not be listing the
__cpu_power of the group, if the __cpu_power has the default value. In
the patch that I sent this morning, I made a mistake by making dependent
the printing of both cpus as well as __cpu_power, on the if
condition which checks if __cpu_power is default or not.
if (group->__cpu_power != SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
printk(KERN_CONT " %s (__cpu_power = %d)", str,
group->__cpu_power);
Unfortunately for me, it's not the first goof up I've been involved in
today. Please find the updated patch below.
---->
sched: Avoid printing sched_group::__cpu_power for default case.
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
The following commit produces a messy dmesg output while attempting to print
the sched_group::__cpu_power for each group in the sched_domain hierarchy.
commit 46e0bb9c12f4bab539736f1714cbf16600f681ec
Author: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Mar 30 10:25:20 2009 +0530
sched: Print sched_group::__cpu_power in sched_domain_debug
Fix this by avoid printing the __cpu_power for default cases.
(i.e, __cpu_power == SCHED_LOAD_SCALE).
Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 681d4ae..db2df70 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7467,7 +7467,9 @@ static int sched_domain_debug_one(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu, int level,
cpumask_or(groupmask, groupmask, sched_group_cpus(group));
cpulist_scnprintf(str, sizeof(str), sched_group_cpus(group));
- printk(KERN_CONT " %s (__cpu_power = %d)", str,
+ printk(KERN_CONT " %s", str);
+ if (group->__cpu_power != SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
+ printk(KERN_CONT " (__cpu_power = %d)",
group->__cpu_power);
group = group->next;
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-14 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-30 4:55 [PATCH] sched: Print sched_group::__cpu_power in sched_domain_debug Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-30 4:55 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-01 16:03 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-13 18:53 ` Tony Luck
2009-04-14 0:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 3:39 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-14 12:03 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Avoid printing sched_group::__cpu_power for default case tip-bot for Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-14 16:29 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Print sched_group::__cpu_power in sched_domain_debug Luck, Tony
2009-04-14 17:06 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-04-14 17:18 ` Luck, Tony
2009-04-14 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 18:42 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Avoid printing sched_group::__cpu_power for default case tip-bot for Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-16 22:48 ` tip-bot for Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090414170621.GA1733@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.