From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.198.245] (helo=rv-out-0708.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LtoB0-0003sA-Ua for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:20:13 +0200 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so2391792rvb.12 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tqWWMcxHkx6jFOP5Qv6Weqg4i7idHIZauhgiCfrhVPk=; b=NBDDVth9Yu+z3N9g2qHbKJpYm2mMVll/VXaFTKqs4ot57n3kDhur3TYo+yJKdFLsH1 wEqLAYreHe5g0Vxu5zdOmQytnpXfjnZ+lPB0lW8z7TameGmjUwm8aIvLGSOUOoMSRVtb iwergJb05wNP86vE4vHUx01iuEDzazkwHyG4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Z5CqJjOwpfKqSLBVSzDQiJOT7Y/osdMq4TD4knOouD3VUzUgOb8whozvbs4r4wT6kZ qkkW259B26IZT/Yp66OgBd/e85rmL5akAMUN3RfwcBdfNTHtAFrfv0nyEL4FD6Sr0AXP t9F7OVrG3MmwlSZS+8eMgpiIsZM+MCT91ekfA= Received: by 10.142.58.20 with SMTP id g20mr3473169wfa.1.1239736588187; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (adsl-71-146-24-121.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [71.146.24.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm22707557wff.35.2009.04.14.12.16.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:21 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20090414191621.GA24045@gmail.com> References: <49DA2F2C.60008@bolloretelecom.eu> <19c1b8a90904061449s1cc1c4e6pb1c04f2c71cc6beb@mail.gmail.com> <1239096233.16991.525.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1239096233.16991.525.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.198.245 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] make "LDFLAGS ignored" QA errors fatal X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:20:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (07/04/09 10:23), Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:49 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > I think we should configure toolchain to pass this flags by gcc driver > > while linking instead of making it a part of LDFLAGS it should help in > > recipes which use gcc to link. > > I'm not sure what that would really buy us. Unless we're going to > abandon LDFLAGS altogether then all the packages that are broken today > would still be broken, it's just that you'd notice the breakage less > often. Plus, it would presumably mean that any changes to the value of yes this would help if we were making changes just to accomodate the gnu-hash linker option > this flag would require a gcc rebuild, which seems like it'd be > annoying. I think chosing the hash style is something you will chose to have or to have not at the beginning. However this will only make toolchain to default to gnu-hash on supported architectures one can still use --hash-style=sysv if one has to Thanks -Khem > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel