From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [213.79.90.228]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE50DDF39 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:50:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:50:09 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add P2020DS board support Message-ID: <20090415165009.GA10214@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <1239810564-8403-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 In-Reply-To: <1239810564-8403-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ted Peters Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:49:24AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Ted Peters > > The P2020 is a dual e500v2 core based SOC with: > * 3 PCIe controllers > * 2 General purpose DMA controllers > * 2 sRIO controllers > * 3 eTSECS > * USB 2.0 > * SDHC > * SPI, I2C, DUART > * enhanced localbus > * and optional Security (P2020E) security w/XOR acceleration > > The p2020 DS reference board is pretty similar to the existing MPC85xx > DS boards and has a ULI 1575 connected on one of the PCIe controllers. > > Signed-off-by: Ted Peters > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- [...] > + soc@ffe00000 { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + device_type = "soc"; > + compatible = "simple-bus"; Sorry for bringing this up again... But can we decide on soc's compatible scheme and finally remove the device_type = "soc" for new boards? "fsl,p2020-soc", "fsl,soc", "simple-bus" maybe? Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2