From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [213.79.90.228]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB7FDE0D1 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:54:48 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:54:47 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add P2020DS board support Message-ID: <20090415175447.GA17134@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <1239810564-8403-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <20090415165009.GA10214@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <5F3E22A9-AC7D-4066-B861-C98755BAE4A8@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 In-Reply-To: <5F3E22A9-AC7D-4066-B861-C98755BAE4A8@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ted Peters Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:22:48PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> >> Sorry for bringing this up again... But can we decide on soc's >> compatible scheme and finally remove the device_type = "soc" >> for new boards? "fsl,p2020-soc", "fsl,soc", "simple-bus" maybe? >> >> Thanks, > > We can, but I don't want to couple the two issues. If someone wants to > work and post patches related to this issue I'm all for it. I posted it in 2008: http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org/msg14311.html Do we agree on "fsl,-{immr,ccsr}", "fsl,{immr,ccsr}", "fsl,soc", "simple-bus"? IIRC you didn't like "fsl,soc" in general and asked for more discussion: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-January/050753.html And from time to time I'm just trying to provoke this discussion. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2