From: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>
To: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Cc: Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@redhat.com>,
SPCA50x Linux Device Driver Development
<spca50x-devs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release!
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:26:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904152326.59464.linux@baker-net.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E5D4DE.6090108@hhs.nl>
On Wednesday 15 Apr 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Currently only whitebalancing is enabled and only on Pixarts (pac) webcams
> (which benefit tremendously from this). To test this with other webcams
> (after instaling this release) do:
>
> export LIBV4LCONTROL_CONTROLS=15
> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l2convert.so v4l2ucp&
>
Strangely while those instructions give me a whitebalance control for the
sq905 based camera I can't get it to appear for a pac207 based camera
regardless of whether LIBV4LCONTROL_CONTROLS is set.
> Notice the whitebalance and normalize checkboxes in v4l2ucp,
> as well as low and high limits for normalize.
>
> Now start your favorite webcam viewing app and play around with the
> 2 checkboxes. Note normalize seems to be useless in most cases. If
> whitebalancing makes a *strongly noticable* difference for your webcam
> please mail me info about your cam (the usb id), then I can add it to
> the list of cams which will have the whitebalancing algorithm (and the v4l2
> control to enable/disable it) enabled by default.
The whitebalance works really well with the sq905 (ID 2770:9120). Without it
the image is very red when using artificial light, with auto whitebalance the
colours look slightly desaturated but otherwise fine.
Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 12:36 libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release! Hans de Goede
2009-04-15 22:26 ` Adam Baker [this message]
2009-04-15 23:02 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-16 20:46 ` Adam Baker
2009-04-17 8:54 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-17 19:27 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-18 11:29 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-18 14:40 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-19 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-19 19:20 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-19 19:49 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-20 4:43 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-20 7:43 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-20 7:54 ` Erik Andrén
2009-04-18 19:44 ` Adam Baker
2009-04-18 22:45 ` [PATCH][libv4l] Support V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_NEXT_CTRL for fake controls Adam Baker
2009-05-17 13:49 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-17 22:13 ` libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release! Adam Baker
2009-04-18 11:27 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-16 6:16 ` Gilles Gigan
2009-04-16 9:25 ` Hans de Goede
2009-04-16 9:38 ` Gilles Gigan
2009-04-17 19:31 ` Erik Andrén
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904152326.59464.linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--to=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spca50x-devs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.