From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:23:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416022305.GA22378@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904152201390.4459@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm having a problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS being too indiscriminate.
> > > > The
> > > > trouble is that it not only creates tracepoint definitions for the
> > > > intended
> > > > tracepoints, but any other tracepoint definitions which get included
> > > > incidentally.
> > > >
> > > > For example, I'm seeing my paravirt tracepoints being instantiated in both
> > > > kernel/sched.o and kernel/irq/manage.o as side-effects of the scheduler
> > > > and
> > > > irq tracepoints being instantiated.
> > > >
> > > > I'm experimenting with a different scheme, wherein a subsystem defines
> > > > CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS in the .c file where it wants to instantiate the
> > > > tracepoints - rather than CREATE_TRACE_POINTS - and its trace/events/foo.h
> > > > does:
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS
> > > > #undef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS /* avoid infinite recursion */
> > > > #include <trace/instantiate_trace.h>
> > > > #else
> > > > #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > where instantiate_trace.h is:
> > > >
> > > > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > > > #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > > > #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>
> Have you tried:
>
> #ifdef CREATE_PVOPS_TRACE_POINTS
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #endif
>
> And in your C file do:
>
> #define CREATE_PVOPS_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/pvops.h>
>
> ??
>
> -- Steve
Jeremy brings up an interesting point. Given that we might eventually
include a few tracepoint header files in a given C file, but with the
intent of only "creating" the tracepoint callbacks for few of these, the
global "CREATE_TRACE_POINTS" flag makes little sense and seems like it
will easily lead to link-time errors.
Maybe we could consider requiring something like the following solution :
In the .c file :
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/subsysa.h>
#undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/subsysb.h>
Where subsysa has its trace points callbacks created, but subsysb
doesn't. This seems half-way understandable, at least.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 0:34 Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 0:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 1:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-04-16 2:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 3:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-16 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090416022305.GA22378@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.