All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] make hd_struct->in_flight atomic to avoid diskstat corruption
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:45:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904161445.03955.knikanth@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090416073557.GU5178@kernel.dk>

On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:05:57 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > The disk statistics exported to userspace through proc and sysfs are
> > not protected by locks to avoid performance overhead. Since most of
> > the statistics are maintained in the per_cpu struct disk_stats, the
> > chances of them getting corrupted is negligible. But the in_flight
> > counter, that records the no of requests currently in progress is not
> > per-cpu. This increases the chance of it getting corrupted. And
> > corruption of this value would result in visibly distorted statistics
> > such as negative in_flight. This can be avoided by making this field
> > atomic.
>
> Hmm. Did you observe this behaviour?

Sorry, not on current kernels. But on a very old 2.6.5 kernel.

Reading Documentation/iostats.txt and the changelog of commit 
e71bf0d0ee89e51b92776391c5634938236977d5 made me assume that this could be a 
problem even today.

> A quick glance at the code reveals
> that the callers of part_inc_in_flight() and part_dec_in_flight() in the
> block layer are always done under the queue lock. Ditto
> part_round_stats(), which calls part_round_stats_single() and also needs
> protection for in_flight.
>
> That basically just leaves the code reading this out and reporting, and
> driver calls to part_round_stats(). I'd suggest looking there instead,
> we're not going to make ->in_flight an atomic just because of some
> silliness there that could be fixed.

Isn't this also true for the stats protected by the part_stat_lock()? Only 
places where we are only reading seems to be called without the queue lock.

Thanks
Nikanth

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-16  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-16  7:24 [PATCH] [RFC] make hd_struct->in_flight atomic to avoid diskstat corruption Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-04-16  7:35 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16  9:15   ` Nikanth Karthikesan [this message]
2009-04-16 14:40     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-16 16:32       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-19  8:51         ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-21  7:31           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904161445.03955.knikanth@suse.de \
    --to=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.