From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: remove superfluous call to synchronize_net()
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:25:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417192551.GA15538@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090417.045631.159492677.davem@davemloft.net>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:56:31AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:40:23 +0200
>
> > [PATCH] net: remove superfluous call to synchronize_net()
> >
> > inet_register_protosw() function is responsible for adding a new
> > inet protocol into a global table (inetsw[]) that is used with RCU rules.
> >
> > As soon as the store of the pointer is done, other cpus might see
> > this new protocol in inetsw[], so we have to make sure new protocol
> > is ready for use. All pending memory updates should thus be committed
> > to memory before setting the pointer.
> > This is correctly done using rcu_assign_pointer()
> >
> > synchronize_net() is typically used at unregister time, after
> > unsetting the pointer, to make sure no other cpu is still using
> > the object we want to dismantle. Using it at register time
> > is only adding an artificial delay that could hide a real bug,
> > and this bug could popup if/when synchronize_rcu() can proceed
> > faster than now.
> >
> > This saves about 13 ms on boot time on a HZ=1000 8 cpus machine ;)
> > (4 calls to inet_register_protosw(), and about 3200 us per call)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
>
> I think this change is fine, so I'm adding it to net-next-2.6
>
> If you guys want to continue discussing the merits of putting
> comments in every spot where we lack a RCU sync call, that's
> your call. :-)
Your Honor, I plead guilty to charges as read. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 15:38 [PATCH] net: remove superfluous call to synchronize_net() Eric Dumazet
2009-04-15 21:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 5:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 18:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-16 18:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-17 11:56 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 19:25 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090417192551.GA15538@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.